ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION PREVALENCE IN MOSCOW IN DIFFERENT TIME INTERVALS
https://doi.org/10.18705/1607-419X-2013-19-2-102-108
Abstract
Objective. To assess population mean blood pressure (BP), prevalence, treatment, and control of arterial hypertension from 1975 to 2001 depending on the socio-demographic indicators
Design and methods. Seven independent cross-sectional population surveys were conducted in 1975–2001 with randomly selected men (10094) and women (3527) aged 25–64 years old,Moscow residents, with response > 70 %. We have combined data from studies performed in Soviet period, «the period of perestroika» and post-Soviet period.
Results. Systolic BP (SBP) has increased from «Soviet period» to «the period of perestroika» in men by 2,5 mmHg (р < 0,05), and in women by 5 mmHg (р < 0,001). Diastolic BP (DBP) has increased among men (from 87,0 to 87,8 mmHg, р < 0,02), and among women (from 81,5 to 87,2 mmHg, р < 0,001). In the late 90’s SBP has decreased (in women from 137,5 to 130,1 mmHg, р < 0,02), DBP has decreased (in men — to 85,1 mmHg, р < 0,02, and in women — to 81,3 mmHg, р < 0,005). There was a statistically signifi cant increase in the prevalence of arterial hypertension from «Soviet period» to «the period of perestroika» (from 46,5 to 49,2 % in men; from 38,7 to 50,3 % in women, р < 0,001). In the post-Soviet period it has decreased among men to 39,8 % and among women to 32,7 % (р < 0,04). The rate of adherence to antihypertensive medications has increased (in men from 6,2 to 19,4 %, р < 0,001; and in women from 15,5 to 26,6 %, р < 0,001). The proportion of effectively treated hypertension has decreased (in men from 35,7 to 23,4 %, and in women from 36,9 to 31,7 %). Control of hypertension improved signifi cantly from 3,6 to 5,8 % (р < 0,01).
Conclusion. The prevalence of arterial hypertension remains high. The main objective of physicians is to increase the number of effectively treated patients and to achieve target levels of blood pressure.
About the Authors
Y. A. BalanovaRussian Federation
Corresponding author: National Research Center for Preventive Medicine, bld. 10–3, of. 324, Petroverigskiy lane,Moscow, 101990. Phone: 8 (495) 627–03–60. E-mail: JBalanova@gnicpm.ru (Yulia A. Balanova, MD, PhD, Senior Researcher at the Department of Epidemiology of Chronic Non-Infectious Diseases, at Laboratory of Socio-Economical Analysis of Non-Infectious Diseases Risk).
S. A. Shalnova
Russian Federation
A. D. Deev
Russian Federation
V. V. Konstantinov
Russian Federation
A. V. Kapustina
Russian Federation
References
1. Kearney P., Whelton M., Reynolds K., Whelton P.K., He J. Worldwide prevalence of hypertension: a systematic review // J. Hypertens. — 2004. — Vol. 22, № 1. — P. 11–19.
2. Ezzati M., Lopez A.D., Rodgers A. et al. Comparative risk assessment collaborative group: selected major risk factors and global and regional burden of disease // Lancet. — 2002. — Vol. 360, № 9343. — P. 1347–1360.
3. Оганов Р.Г., Тимофеева Т.Н., Колтунов И.Е. и др. Эпидемиология артериальной гипертонии в России. Результаты федерального мониторинга 2003–2010 годы // Кардиоваск. тер. профилакт. — 2011. — № 1. — С. 9–13. // Oganov R.G., Timofeeva T.N., Koltunov I.E. et al. Epidemiology of arterial hypertension in Russia. Results of Federal Monitoring in 2003–2010 years // Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention [Kardiovaskulyarnaya Terapiya i Profi laktika]. — 2011. — № 1. — Р. 9–13 [Russian].
4. Ford E.S., Ajani U.A., Croft J.B. et al. Explaining the decrease in U.S. deaths from coronary disease, 1980–2000 // N. Engl. J. Med. — 2007. — Vol. 356, № 7. — Р. 2388–2398.
5. Vartiainen E., Puska P., Pekkanen J., Tuomilehto J., Jousilahti P. Changes in risk factors explain changes in mortality from ischaemic heart disease in Finland // Br. Med. J. — 1994. — Vol. 309, № 6946. — P. 23–27.
6. Cifkova R., Skodova Z., J. Bruthans et al. Longitudinal trends in major cardiovascular risk factors in the Czech population between 1985 and 2007/8. Czech MONICA and post-MONICA // Atherosclerosis. — 2010. — Vol. 211, № 2. — P. 676–681.
7. Culter J.A., Sorlie P.D., Wolz M., Thom T., Fields L.E., Roccella E.J. Trends in hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control rates in United States adults between 1988–1994 and 1999–2004 // J. Hypertens. — 2008. — Vol. 52, № 5 — P. 818–827.
8. Баланова Ю.А., Вилков В.Г., Доценко А.Н. и др. Результаты второго этапа мониторинга эпидемиологической ситуации по артериальной гипертонии в РФ (2005–2007), проведенного в рамках Федеральной целевой программы «Профилактика и лечение артериальной гипертонии в РФ» // Информационно-статистический сб. — М., 2008. — 224 с. / Balanova Y.A., Vilkov V.G., Dotsenko A.N. et al. Results of the second stage of epidemiological monitoring on arterial hypertension in Russian Federation (2005–2007) in the frame of Federal Target Program «Prevention and management of arterial hypertension in Russian Federation» // Information-statistical workbook. — M., 2008. — 224 p. [Russian].
9. Morenoff J.D., Hansen B.B., House J.S. et al. Understanding social disparities in hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control: the role of neighborhood context. Population Studies Center University of Michigan/Institute of Social Research. Report 07-614, January 2007, — 39 p.
10. New York State Department of Health: the burden of cardiovascular disease in New York: mortality, prevalence, risk factors, costs, and selected populations. — Albany, NY, 2003. — 111 p.
11. Wolf-Maier K., Cooper R.S., Banegas J.R. et al. Hypertension prevalence and blood pressure levels in 6 European countries, Canada and the United States // J. Am. Med. Assoc. — 2003. — Vol. 289, № 18. — P. 2363–2369.
12. Kearney P., Whelton M., Reynolds K., Muntner P., Whelton P.K., He J. Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data // Lancet. — 2005. — Vol. 365, № 9455. — P. 217–223. 13. De Henauw S., De Bacquer D., Fonteyne W., Stam M., Kornitzer M., De Backer G. Trends in the prevalence, detection, treatment and control of arterial hypertension in the Belgian adult population // J. Hypertens. — 1998. — Vol. 16, № 3. — P. 277–284.
13. Cifkova R., Skodova Z., Bruthans J. et al. Longitudinal trends in cardiovascular mortality and blood pressure levels, prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the Czech population from 1985 to 2007/2008 // J. Hypertens. — 2010. — Vol. 28, № 11. — Р. 2196–2203.
14. Burt V.L., Cutler J.A., Higgins M. et al. Trends in the prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the adult US population. Data from the Health Examination Surveys, 1960 to 1991 // Hypertension. — 1995. — Vol. 26, № 1. — P. 60–69.
15. Hajjar I., Kotchen T. Trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the United States in 1988–2000 // J. Am. Med. Assoc. — 2003. — Vol. 290, № 2. — P. 199–206.
16. Ong K.L., Cheung B., Man Y.B., Lau C.P., Lam K.S. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension among United States adults 1999–2004 // Hypertension. — 2007. — Vol. 49, № 1. — P. 69–75.
17. Heidenreich P.A., Trogdon J.G., Khavjou O.A. et al. Forecasting the future of cardiovascular disease in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association // Circulation. — 2011. — Vol. 123, № 8. — P. 933–944.
18. Wu X., Duan X., Gu D., Hao J., Tao S., Fan D. Prevalence of hypertension and its trends in Chinese populations // Int. J. Cardiol. — 1995. — Vol. 52, № 1. — P. 39–44.
19. Primatesta P., Brookes M., Poulter N.R. Improved hypertension management and control: results from the health survey for England 1998 // Hypertension. — 2001. — Vol. 38. — P. 827–832.
20. Gu Q., Burt V.L., Dillon C.F., Yoon S. Trends in antihypertensive medication use and blood pressure control among United States adults with hypertension: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001 to 2010 // Circulation. — 2012. — Vol. 126, № 17. — P. 2105–2114.
Review
For citations:
Balanova Y.A., Shalnova S.A., Deev A.D., Konstantinov V.V., Kapustina A.V. ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION PREVALENCE IN MOSCOW IN DIFFERENT TIME INTERVALS. "Arterial’naya Gipertenziya" ("Arterial Hypertension"). 2013;19(2):102-108. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18705/1607-419X-2013-19-2-102-108