Preview

Артериальная гипертензия

Расширенный поиск

Клиническое применение устройств для тромбэктомии и предупреждения дистальной эмболизации при проведении чрескожных эндоваскулярных вмешательств на коронарных артериях

https://doi.org/10.18705/1607-419X-2009-15-2-153-161

Полный текст:

Об авторах

Д. А. Зверев
Федеральный центр сердца, крови и эндокринологии им. В.А. Алмазова
Россия


Э. В. Кулешова
Федеральный центр сердца, крови и эндокринологии им. В.А. Алмазова
Россия


А. В. Воробьева
Федеральный центр сердца, крови и эндокринологии им. В.А. Алмазова
Россия


Список литературы

1. Van't Hof A.W., Liem А., Hoorntje J.C. et al. Angiographic assessment of myocardial reperfusion in patients treated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction myocardial blush grade // Circulation. - 1998. - Vol. 97, № 23. - P. 2302-2306.

2.

3. Brosh D., Assai A.H., Mager A. et al. Effect of no-reflow during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction on six-month mortality // Am. J. Cardiol. - 2007. - Vol. 99, № 44. - P. 442-445.

4.

5. Morishima I., Sone T., Okumura K. et al. Angiographic no-reflow phenomenon as a predictor of adverse long-term outcome in patients treated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for first acute myocardial infarction // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. - 2000. - Vol. 36. - P. 1202-1209.

6.

7. Henriques J.P., Zijlstra F., Va't Hoff A.W. et al. Angiographic assessment of reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction by myocardial blush grade // Circulation. - 2003. - Vol. 107, № 16. - P. 2115-2119.

8.

9. De Luca G., Suryapranata H., de Boer M. et al. Ongoing Tirofiban In Myocardial Infarction Evaluation (On-TIME) study group // Int. J. Cardiol. - 2007. - Vol. 117, № 2. - P. 232-237.

10.

11. Tamaszuk-Kazberuk A., Musial W.J., Dobrzycki S. et al. Normalization of elevated ST segment predicts return of left ventricular systolic function and improved outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction, treated with primary coronary angioplasty // Kardiol. Pol. - 2004. - Vol. 60, № 6. - P. 541-549.

12.

13. Brodie B.R., Sbjckey T.D., Hansen C. et al. Relation between electrocardiographic ST-segment resolution and early and late outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction // Am. J. Cardiol. - 2005. - Vol. 95, № 3. - P. 343-348.

14.

15. Morishima I., Sone T., Okumura K. et al. Angiagraphic no-reftow phenomenon as a predictor of adverse long-term outcome in patients treated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for first acute myocardial infarction // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. - 2000. - Vol. 36. - P. 1202-1209.

16.

17. Ohtani T., Ueda Y., Shimizu M. et al. Association between cardiac troponin T elevation and angioscopic morphology of culpit lesion in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome // Am. Heart. J. - 2005. - Vol. 150, № 2. - P. 227-233.

18.

19. Wilensky R.L., Selzer F., Johnston J. at al. Relation of percutaneous coronary intervention of complex lesions to clinical outcomes // Am. J. Cardiol. - 2002. - Vol. 90, № 3. - P. 216-221.

20.

21. White C.J., Ramee S.R., Coins T.J. et al. Coronary thrombi increase PTCA risk. Angioscopy as a clinical tool // Circulation. - 1996. - Vol. 93, № 2. - P. 253-258

22.

23. Henriques J.P., Zijlstra F., Ottervanger J.P. et al. Incidence and clinical significance of distal embolization during primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction // Eur. Heart J. - 2002. - Vol. 23. - P. 1112-1117.

24.

25. Burzotta F., Trani C., Romagnoli E. et al. Manual thrombus-aspiration improves myocardial reperfusion: the randomized evaluation of the effect of mechanical reduction of distal embolization by thrombus aspiration in primary and rescue angioplasty (REMEDIA) trial // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. - 2005. - Vol. 46. - P. 371-376.

26.

27. Silva-Orrego P., Colombo P., Bigi R. et al. Thrombus aspiration before primary angioplasty improves myocardial reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction: the DEAR-MI study // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. - 2006. - Vol. 48, № 8. - P. 1552-1559.

28.

29. De Luca L., Sardella G., Davidson C.J. et al. Impact of intracoronary aspiration thrombectomy during primary angioplasty on left ventricular remodelling in patients with anterior ST elevation myocardial infarction // Heart. - 2006. - Vol. 92, № 7. - P. 951-957.

30.

31. Pfeffer M.A., Braunwald E. Ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction: experimental observations and clinical implications // Circulation. - 1990. - Vol. 81. - P. 1161-1172.

32.

33. Ali A., Cox D., Dib N. et al. AIMI Investigators. Rheolytic thrombectomy with percutaneous coronary intervention for infarct size reduction in acute myocardial infarction: 30-day results from a multicenter randomized study // J. Am. Coll. Cariol. - 2006. - Vol. 43. - P. 244-252.

34.

35. Antoniucci D., Valenti R., Migliorini A. et al. Comparison of rheolytic thrombectomy before direct infarct artery stenting versus direct stenting alone in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction // Am. J. Cardiol. - 2004. - Vol. 93. - P. 1033-1035.

36.

37. Antoniucci D. Rheolytic Thrombectomy in Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Florence Experience and Objectives of the Multicenter Randomized JETSTENT Trial // J. Invasive Cardiol. - 2006. - Vol. 18 (Suppl C). - P. 32C-34C.

38.

39. Simonton C.A., Brodie B.R., Wilson H. AngioJet experience from the multi-center STENT registry // J. Invasive Cardiol. - 2006. - Vol. 18 (Suppl С). - P. 2С-ЗС.

40.

41. Margheri M., Falai M., Vittori G. et al. Safety and efficacy of the AngioJet in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the Florence Appraisal Study of Rheolytic Thrombectomy (FAST) // J. Invasive Cardiol. - 2006. - Vol. 18, № 10. - P. 481-486.

42.

43. Nopadano M., Pasquetto G., Sacca S. et al. Intracoronary thrombectomy improves myocardial reperfusion in patients undergoing direct angioplasty for асute myocardial infarction // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. - 2006. - Vol. 42. - P. 1395-1402.

44.

45. Lefevre T., Garcia E. Reimers B at al. X AMINE ST Investigators. X-sizer for thrombectomy in acute myocardial infarction improves ST-segment resolution: results of the X-sizer in AMI for negligible embolization and optimal ST resolution (X. AMINE ST) trial // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. - 2006. - Vol. 46. P. 246-252.

46.

47. Stone G.W., Cox D.A., Babb J. et al. Prospective, randomized evaluation of thrombectomy prior to percutaneous intervention in diseased saphenous vein grafts, and thrombus-containing coronary arteries // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. - 2003. - Vol. 42, № 11. - P. 2007-2013.

48.

49. Topaz O., Bernardo N.L., Shah R. et al. Effectiveness of excimer laser coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction or in unstable angina pectoris // Am. J. Cardiol. - 2001. - Vol. 87, № 7. - P. 849-855.

50.

51. Dorr M., Vogelgesang D., Hummel A. et al. Excimer laser thrombus elimination for prevention of distal embolization and no-reflow in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction: results from the randomized LaserAMI study // Int. J. Cardiol. - 2007. - Vol. 116, № 1. - P. 20-26.

52.

53. De Luca G., Suryapranata H., Chiariello M. Prevention of distal embolization in patients undergoing mechanical revascularization tor acute myocardial infarction. A review of current status // Thromb. Haemost. - 2006. - Vol. 96, № 6. - P. 700-710.

54.

55. Kunadian B., Dunning J., Vijayalakshmi K. et al. Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing anti-embolic devices with standard PCI for improving myocardial reperfusion in patient with acute myocardial infarction // Catheter Cardiovasc. Inerv. - 2007. - Vol. 69, № 4. - P. 488-496.

56.

57. Burzotta F., Testa L., Gianrico F. et al. Adjunctive devices in primary or rescue PCI: A meta-analysis of randomized trials // Int. J. Cardiol. - 2007. - Vol. 23. - P. 231-234.

58.

59. Haager P.K., Christott P., Heussen N. et al. Prediction of clinical outcome after mechanical revascularization in acute myocardial infarction by markers of myocardial reperfusion // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. - 2003. - Vol. 41, № 4. - P. 532-533.

60.

61. Kaltof A., Bottcher M., Nielsen S.S. et al. Routine thrombectomy in percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a randomized, controlled trial // Circulation. - 2006. - Vol. 114. - P. 40-47.

62.

63. Eeckhout E., Kem M.J. The coronary no-reflow phenomenon: a review of mechanisms and therapies // Eur. Heart J. - 2001. - Vol. 22. - P. 729-739.

64.

65. Stone G.W., Webb J., Cox D.A. et al. Enhanced Myocardial Efficacy and Recovery by Aspiration of Liberated Debris (EMERALD) Investigators. Distal microcirculatory protection during percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: arandomized controlled trial // J. Am. Med. Assoc. - 2005. - Vol. 293. - P. 1063-1072.

66.

67. Matsuo A., Inoue N., Suzuki K. et al. Limitations of using a GuardWire temporary occlusion and aspiration system in patients with acute myocardial infarction: multicenter investigation of coronary artery protection with a distal occlusion device in acute myocardial infarction (MICADO) // J. Jnvasive Cardiol. - 2007. - Vol. 19, № 3. - P. 132-138.

68.

69. Baim D.S., Wahr D., George B. et al. Saphenous wein graft Angioplasty Free of Emboli Randomized (SAFER) Trial Investigators. Randomized trial of a distal embolic protection device during percutaneous intervention of saphenous vein aorto-coronary bypass gratis // Circulation. - 2002. - Vol. 106, № 11. - P. 1285-1230.

70.

71. Giugliano G., Kurtz R., Popma J. et al. Saphenous Vein Graft Angioplasty Free of Emboli Randomized (SAFER) Trial Investigators. Determinants of 30-day adverse events following saphenous vein graft intervention with and without a distal occlusion embolic protection device // Am. J. Cardiol. - 2005. - Vol. 95, № 2. - P. 173-177.

72.

73. Hori M., Inoue M., Kitakaze M. et al. Role of adenosine in hyperemic response of coronary blood flow in microembolization // Am. J. Physiol. - 1986. - Vol. 250, № 3. - P. H509-513.

74.

75. Gick M., Jander N., Bestehcm H.P. et al. Randomized evaluation of the effects of filter-based distal protection on myocardial perfusion and infarct size after primary percutaneous: catheter intervention in myocardial infarction with and without ST-segment elevation // Circulation. - 2005. - Vol. 112. - P. 1462-1469.

76.

77. Сurа F.A., Escudero A.G., Berrocal D. et al. PREMIAR Investigartors. Protection of Distal Embolization in High-Risk Patients with Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (PREMIAR) // Am. J. Cardiol. - 2007. - Vol. 99, № 3. - P. 357-363.

78.

79. Dixon S. on behalf of the SPIDER investigators. The saphenous vein graft protection in a distal embolic protection randomized (SPIDER) trial. / In: Annual Symposium, Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics, Washington, DC, 2005.

80.

81. Halkin A., Masud A.Z., Rogers C. et al. Six-month outcomes after percutaneous intervention for lesions in aorto-coronary saphenous vein grafts using distal protection devices: results from the FIRE trial // Am. Heart J. - 2006. - Vol. 151, № 4. - P. el-e7.

82.

83. Carrozza J.P., Mumma M., Breall J. et al. PRIDE Study Investigators. Randomized evaluation of the TriActiv balloon-protection flush and extraction system for the treatment of saphenous vein graft disease // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. - 2005. - Vol. 46. - P. 1677-1683.

84.

85. Sievert H., Wahr D.W., Schuler G., Scholer J.J. et al. Effectiveness and safety of the Praxis system in demonstrating retrograde coronary blood flow during proximal occlusion and in capturing embolic material // Am. J. Cardiol. - 2004. - Vol. 94, № 9. - P. 1134-1139.

86.

87. Mauri L., Cox D., Hermiller J. et al. The PROXIMAL trial: proximal protection during saphenous vein graft intervention using the Praxis Embolic Protection System: a randomized, prospective, multicenter clinical trial // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. - 2007. - Vol. 50, № 15. - P. 1442-1449.

88.

89. Koch K.T., Haeck J.D.E., Kramer M.C.A. et al. Proximal protection of the distal microcirculation during primary PCI: is it the answer? single center registry data on safety and feasibility. ТСТ oral presentation, 2007.

90.

91. Mamas A., Fraser D., Fath F. The role of thromboectomy and distal protection devices during percutaneous coronary interventions. EuroInterv. - 2008. - Vol. 4. - P. 115-123.

92.

93. Roffi M., Mukherjee D. Current role of emboli protection devices in percutaneous coronary and vascular interventions // Am. Heart J. - 2008. - Vol. 157. - P. 263-270.

94.

95. Kelbaek H., Terkeisen C.J., Helqvist S. et al. Randomized comparison of distal protection versus conventional treatment in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: the drug elution and distal protection in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (DEDICATION) trail // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. - 2008. - Vol. 51. - P. 899-905.

96.

97. Cura F.A., Escudero A.G., Berrocal D. et al. Protection distal Embolization in High-Risk Patients with Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (PREMIAR) // Am. J. Cardiol. - 2007. - Vol. 99. - P. 357-363.

98.


Для цитирования:


Зверев Д.А., Кулешова Э.В., Воробьева А.В. Клиническое применение устройств для тромбэктомии и предупреждения дистальной эмболизации при проведении чрескожных эндоваскулярных вмешательств на коронарных артериях. Артериальная гипертензия. 2009;15(2):153-161. https://doi.org/10.18705/1607-419X-2009-15-2-153-161

For citation:


Zverev D., Kuleshova E.V., Vorobieva A.V. Devices for thrombectomy and distal emboli protection during percutaneous сoronary interventions. "Arterial’naya Gipertenziya" ("Arterial Hypertension"). 2009;15(2):153-161. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18705/1607-419X-2009-15-2-153-161

Просмотров: 129


Creative Commons License
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1607-419X (Print)
ISSN 2411-8524 (Online)