Preview

"Arterial’naya Gipertenziya" ("Arterial Hypertension")

Advanced search

Incidence and features of left ventricular hypertrophy in highly compliant hypertensive patients

https://doi.org/10.18705/1607-419X-2011-17-5-454-459

Abstract

Objective. To estimate occurrence and peculiarities of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in highly compliant hypertensive patients without target organ damage under prolonged dynamic observation. Design and methods. A cohort prospective trial was conducted. 428 hypertensive patients without target organ damage took part in the trial. The observation period made up 8,8 ± 2,6 years. Results. At baseline LVH occurred in 36,9 % (95 % CI = 0,34-0,40) of highly compliant hypertensive patients without target organ damage. In males LVH occurred more often than in females: 41,3 vs 32,7 % (95 % CI for males — 0,39-0,44; for females — 0,28-0,38). Left ventricular concentric remodeling was predominant among other cardiac structural changes in patients with LVH. No significant differences in terms of concentric LVH and eccentric LVH occurrence were found. Both odds ratio and relative risk of LVH development in patients who did not achieve target office SBP < 140 mmHg, DBP < 90 mmHg and SBP/DBP < 140/90 mmHg were not significant. Further SBP decrease till 125-130 mmHg and DBP till 80-84 mmHg in daytime, and night systolic hypertension according to 24-hour blood pressure monitoring were associated with the increase of left ventricular myocardial mass index. Conclusions. In highly compliant hypertensive patients under adequate dynamic observation LVH occurred more rarely than in common population, and has specific features.

About the Authors

N. A. Koziolova
State Medical Academy named after E.A. Vagner
Russian Federation


I. M. Shatunova
OJSC «Gazprom» Outpatient Clinic
Russian Federation


I. A. Lazarev
OJSC «Gazprom» Outpatient Clinic
Russian Federation


References

1. Egan B.M., Zhao Y., Axon R.N. US Trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension, 1988-2008 // J. Am. Med. Assoc. — 2010. — Vol. 303, № 20. — P. 2043-2050.

2. Erdine S. Compliance with the treatment of hypertension: the potential of combination therapy // J. Clin. Hypertens. (Greenwich). — 2010. — Vol. 12, № 1. — P. 40-46.

3. Julien J., Tranche C., Souchet T. Left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients. Epidemiology and prognosis // Arch. Mal. Coeur Vaiss. — 2004. — Vol. 97, № 3. — P. 221-227.

4. Devereux R.B., Bella J., Boman K. et al. Echocardiography left ventricular geometry in hypertensive patients with electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy: The LIFE Study // Blood Press. — 2001. — Vol. 10, № 2. — P. 74-82.

5. Conrady A.O., Rudomanov O.G., Zaharov D.V. et al. Prevalence and determinants of left ventricular hypertrophy and remodelling patterns in hypertensive patients: the St. Petersburg study // Blood Press. — 2004. — Vol. 13, № 2. — P. 101-109.

6. Verdecchia P., Staessen J.A., Angeli F. et al. The Cardio-Sis Investigators. Usual versus tight control of systolic blood pressure in non-diabetic patients with hypertension (Cardio-Sis): an open-label randomized trial // Lancet. — 2009. — Vol. 374, № 9689. — P. 525-533.

7. Messerli F.H., Mancia G., Conti C.R. et al. Dogma disputed: can aggressively lowering blood pressure in hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease be dangerous? // Ann. Intern. Med. — 2006. — Vol. 144, № 12. — P. 884-893.

8. Cuspidi C., Giudici V., Negri F., Sala C. Nocturnal nondipping and left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertension: an updated review // Expert. Rev. Cardiovasc. Ther. — 2010. — Vol. 8, № 6. — P. 781-792.

9. Arguedas J.A., Perez M.I., Wright J.M. Treatment blood pressure targets for hypertension // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. — 2009. — № 3. — P. CD004349.

10. ACCORD Study Group, Cushman W.C., Evans G.W., Byington R.P. et al. Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus // N. Engl. J. Med. — 2010. — Vol. 362, № 17. — P. 1575-1585.

11. Cooper-DeHoff R.M., Gong Y., Handberg E.M. et al. Tight blood pressure control and cardiovascular outcomes among hypertensive patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease // J. Am. Med. Assoc. — 2010. — Vol. 304, № 1. — P. 61-68.

12. O'Halloran P., Gran G., Beringer T. et al. A cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate a policy of making hip protectors available to residents of nursing homes // Age Ageing. — 2004. — Vol. 33, № 6. — P. 582-588.

13. Mos L., Visentin P., Zaetta V. et al. Pre-menopausal women are more prone to develop left ventricular hypertrophy than men in stage 1 hypertension. A longitudinal analysis from the HARVEST // Eur. Heart J. — 2007. — Vol. 28, suppl. — P. 264-265.

14. Cuspidi C., Lonati L., Macca G. et al. Prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy and carotid thickening in a large selected hypertensive population: impact of different echocardiographic and ultrasonographic diagnostic criteria // Blood Press. — 2001. — Vol. 10, № 3. — P. 142-149.

15. Schmieder R.E., Kjeldsen S.E., Julius S. et al. Determinants of the new development of left ventricular hypertrophy on treated hypertensives: The VALUE-trial. Abstract 7B.2 // J. Hypertens. — 2004. — Vol. 22, suppl. 2. — Р. S277.


Review

For citations:


Koziolova N.A., Shatunova I.M., Lazarev I.A. Incidence and features of left ventricular hypertrophy in highly compliant hypertensive patients. "Arterial’naya Gipertenziya" ("Arterial Hypertension"). 2011;17(5):454-459. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18705/1607-419X-2011-17-5-454-459

Views: 5021


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1607-419X (Print)
ISSN 2411-8524 (Online)