Carbohydrate metabolism and transformation of pre-diabetes into type 2 diabetes mellitus depending on diagnostic methods in nondiabetic patients with hypertension and high cardiovascular risk

Objective. To assess the glycemia status and risk of progression to diabetes mellitus (DM) depending on diagnostic criteria (fasting glucose, 2-h glucose, glycated hemoglobin HbA1c and their combination) in hypertensive patients with high cardiovascular (CV) risk without known DM. Methods. 433 hypertensive patients with high CV risk were included in the study. Stratification of CV risk was done in accordance with national guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension (2010). Patients were divided into groups with noncomplicated (n = 201) and complicated (n = 232) arterial hypertension. Follow-up was 6 years. Fasting glucose, 2-h glucose during oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and HbA1c were assessed in all patients each 6 months. The patients were divided into groups with normoglycemia, impaired fasting glucose (IFG), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), its combination (IFG/IGT), isolated HbA1c 5,7-6,4 % and newly diagnosed DM (ADA2011). Results. Impaired glucose status was diagnosed in 82 % of patients with arterial hypertension and high CV risk according to fasting glucose, 2-h glucose, HbA1c diagnostic criteria. IFG was the most prevalent in patients with non-complicated arterial hypertension, and newly diagnosed DM — in complicated arterial hypertension. HbA1c used as an additional criterion of impaired glucose metabolism in addition to OGTT contributes to the better identification of newly diagnosed DM in high risk hypertensive patients for 10 %. Two-hour hyperglycemia has higher predictive value for diagnosing DM in patients with complicated arterial hypertension, thus imposing the obligatory OGTT assessment in this group of patients. OGTT is desirable, but non-obligatory in patients with non-complicated arterial hypertension. Conclusion. The assessment of HbA1c and fasting glucose/2-h postload glucose has independent and complementary importance and helps to identify patients with different pathogenetic mechanisms of glucose metabolism impairment. Prognostic value of HbA1c as a diagnostic criterion of risk progression to DM is comparable with fasting glucose/ 2-h postload glucose assessment.

arterial hypertension, impaired glucose metabolism, glycated haemoglobin

1. Дедов И.И., Шестакова М.В., Сунцов Ю.И. Сахарный диабет с России: проблемы и решения. — M., 2008. — С. 3-6.

2. Дедов И.И., Шестакова М.В. Сахарный диабет в пожилом возрасте: диагностика, клиника, лечение. Практическое руководство для врачей. — М., 2011. — C. 1-79.

3. Маслова О.В., Сунцов Ю.И. Эпидемиология сахарного диабета и микрососудистых осложнений // Сахарный диабет. — 2011. — № 3. — С. 6-11.

4. International Diabetes Federation. 5 th edition of Diabetes Atlas, 2011. — URL: http://www.idf.org/diabetesatlas/5e/the-global-burden

5. Сунцов Ю.И., Болотская Л.Л., Маслова О.В., Казаков И.В. Эпидемиология сахарного диабета и прогноз его распространенности в Российской Федерации // Сахарный диабет. — 2011. — № 1. — С. 15-18.

6. Дедов И.И., Шестакова М.В., Аметов А.С. и др. Проект «Консенсус совета экспертов Российской ассоциации эндокринологов (РАЭ) по инициации и интенсификации сахароснижающей терапии сахарного диабета 2 типа» // Сахарный диабет. — 2011. — № 1. — С. 95-105.

7. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group: Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33) // Lancet. — 1998. — Vol. 352, № 9131. — P. 837-853.

8. Davidson J., Parkin C. Is hyperglycemia a causal factor in cardiovascular disease? Does proving this relationship really matter? Yes // Diabetes Care. — 2009. — Vol. 32, Suppl. 2. — P. 331-333.

9. Барсуков А.В., Таланцева М.С. Эссенциальная гипертензия у пациентов с сахарным диабетом 2 типа: актуальные вопросы антигипертензивной терапии в свете медицины, основанной на доказательствах // Артериальная гипертензия. — 2011. — Т. 17, № 6. — С. 518-524.

10. Ford E.S. The metabolic syndrome and mortality from cardiovascular disease and all-causes: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey II Mortality Study // Atherosclerosis. — 2004. — Vol. 173, № 2. — P. 309-314.

11. Malik S., Wong N.D., Franklin S.S. et al. Impact of the metabolic syndrome on mortality from coronary heart disease, cardiovascular disease and on all causes in United States adult // Circulation. — 2004. — Vol. 110, № 10. — P. 1245-1250.

12. Kahn R., Buse J., Ferrannini E., Stern M.; American Diabetes Association; European Association for the Study of Diabetes. The metabolic syndrome: time for a critical appraisal // Diabetes Care. — 2005. — Vol. 28, № 9. — P. 2289-2304.

13. Паскарь Н.А., Парижская Е.Н. Оценка и управление суммарным риском сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний (опыт работы кабинетов профилактики артериальной гипертензии поликлиник Санкт-Петербурга) // Артериальная гипертензия. — 2009. — Т. 15, № 6. — С. 707-709.

14. American diabetes association. Standards of medical care in diabetes — 2010 // Diabetes Care. — 2010. — Vol. 33, № 1. — P. 11-61.

15. Алгоритмы специализированной медицинской помощи больным сахарным диабетом. 5-й выпуск // Сахарный диабет. — 2011. — № 3, прил. — С. 1-72.

16. International Expert Committee. International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1C assay in the diagnosis of diabetes // Diabetes Care. — 2009. — Vol. 32. — P. 1327-1334.

17. Mitka M. Hemoglobin A1c poised to become preferred test for diagnosing diabetes // J. Am. Med. Assoc. — 2009. — Vol. 301, № 15. — P. 1528.

18. Cheng Y.J., Gregg E.W., Geiss L.S. et al. Association of A1C and fasting plasma glucose levels with diabetic retinopathy prevalence in the U.S. population: implications for diabetes diagnostic thresholds // Diabetes Care. — 2009. — Vol. 32, № 7. — P. 2027-2032.

19. Ollerton R.L., Playle R., Ahmed K., Dunstan F.D., Luzio S.D., Owens D.R. Day-to-day variability of fasting plasma glucose in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic subjects // Diabetes Care. — 1999. — Vol. 22, № 3. — P. 394-398.

20. Sacks D.B., Bruns D.E., Goldstein D.E., Maclaren N.K., McDonald J.M., Parrot M. Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus // Clin. Chem. — 2002. — Vol. 48, № 3. — P. 436-472.

21. Olson D.E., Rhee M.K., Herrick K. et al. Screening for diabetes and prediabetes with proposed A1c-based diagnostic criteria // Diabetes Care. — 2010. — Vol. 33, № 10. — P. 2184-2189.

22. Mostafa S.A., Khunti K., Srinivasan B.T., Webb D., Gray L.J., Davies M.J. The potential impact and optimal cut-points of using glycated haemoglobin, HbA1c, to detect people with impaired glucose regulation in a UK multi-ethnic cohort // Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. — 2010. — Vol. 90, № 1. — P. 100-108.

23. Christensen D.L., Witte D.R., Kaduka L. et al. Moving to an A1C-based diagnosis of diabetes has a different impact on prevalence in different ethnic groups // Diabetes Care. — 2010. — Vol. 33, № 3. — P. 580-582.

24. Herman W.H., Ma Y., Uwaifo G. et al. Differences in A1C by race and ethnicity among patients with impaired glucose tolerance in the Diabetes Prevention Program // Diabetes Care. — 2007. — Vol. 30., № 10. — P. 2453-2457.

25. Mann D.M., Carson A.P., Shimbo D., Fonseca V., Fox C.S., Muntner P. Impact of A1C screening criterion on the diagnosis of pre-diabetes among U.S. adults // Diabetes Care. — 2010. — Vol. 33, № 10. — P. 2190-2195.

26. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin // N. Engl. J. Med. — 2002. — Vol. 346, № 6. — P. 393-403.

27. Chiasson J.-L., Josse R.G., Gomis R., Hanefeld M., Karasik A., Laakso M. Acarbose for prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus: the STOP-NIDDM randomised trial // Lancet. — 2002. — Vol. 359, № 9323. — P. 2072-2077.

28. Gerstein H.C., Yusuf S., Bosch J. et al. Effect of rosiglitazone on the frequency of diabetes in patients with impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose: a randomised controlled trial // Lancet. — 2006. — Vol. 368, № 9541. — P. 1096-1105.

29. Cederberg H., Saukkonen T., Laakso M. et al. Postchallenge glucose, A1C, and fasting glucose as predictors of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease: a 10-year prospective cohort study // Diabetes Care. — 2010. — Vol. 33, № 9. — P. 2077-2083.

30. Selvin E., Steffes M.W., Gregg E., Brancati F.L., Coresh J. Performance of A1C for the classification and prediction of diabetes // Diabetes Care. — 2011. — Vol. 34, № 1. — P. 84-89.

31. de Vegt F., Dekker J.M., Jager A. et al. Relation of impaired fasting and postload glucose with incident type 2 diabetes in a Dutch population: The Hoorn Study // J. Am. Med. Assoc. — 2001. — Vol. 285, № 16. — P. 2109-2113.

32. Nathan D.M., Davidson M.B., DeFronzo R.A. et al. Impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance: implications for care // Diabetes Care. — 2007. — Vol. 30, № 3. — P. 753-759.

33. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2011. Position statement. American Diabetes Association // Diabetes Care. — 2011. — Vol. 34, Suppl. 1. — P. 11-61.

34. Диагностика и лечение артериальной гипертензии. Российские рекомендации (четвертый пересмотр) — 2010 // Системные гипертензии. — 2010. — № 3. — С. 5-26.

35. Levey A.S., Bosch J.P., Lewis J.B., Greene T., Rogers N., Roth D. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group // Ann. Intern. Med. — 1999. — Vol. 130, № 6. — P. 461-470

36. Levey A.S., Stevens L.A., Schmid C.H. et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate // Ann. Intern. Med. — 2009. — Vol. 150, № 9. — P. 604-612.

37. Heianza Y., Hara S., Arase Y. et al. HbA1c 5.7-6.4% and impaired fasting plasma glucose for diagnosis of prediabetes and risk of progression to diabetes in Japan (TOPICS 3): a longitudinal cohort study // Lancet. — 2011. — Vol. 378, № 9786. — Р. 147-155.

38. Nichols G.A., Hillier T.A., Brown J.B. Progression from newly acquired impaired fasting glusose to type 2 diabetes // Diabetes Care. — 2007. — Vol. 30, № 2. — P. 228-233.

39. Nathan D.M., Davidson M.B., DeFronzo R.A. et al. Impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance: implications for care // Diabetes Care. — 2007. — Vol. 30, № 3. — Р. 753-759.

40. van‘t Riet E., Alssema M., Rijkelijkhuizen J.M., Kos-tense P.J., Nijpels G., Dekker J.M. Relationship between A1C and glucose levels in the general Dutch population: the new Hoorn study // Diabetes Care. — 2010. — Vol. 33, № 1. — P. 61-66.

41. Древаль А.В., Мисникова И.В., Барсуков И.А., Пончакова Г.В., Кузнецов А.В. Распространенность сахарного диабета 2 типа и других нарушений углеводного обмена в зависимости от критериев диагностики // Сахарный диабет. — 2010. — № 1. — C. 116-121.

42. Wang W., Lee E.T., Howard B.V. et al. Fasting plasma glucose and hemoglobin A1c in identifying and predicting diabetes: the Strong Heart Study // Diabetes Care. — 2011. — Vol. 34, № 2. — P. 363-368.

43. Lorenzo C., Wagenknecht L.E., Hanley A.J., Rewers M.J., Karter A.J., Haffner S.M. A1C between 5,7 and 6,4% as a marker for identifying pre-diabetes, insulin sensitivity and secretion, and cardiovascular risk factors: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study (IRAS) // Diabetes Care. — 2010. — Vol. 33, № 9. — P. 2104-2109.

44. Mohan V., Vijayachandrika V., Gokulakrishnan K. et al. A1C cut points to define various glucose intolerance groups in Asian Indians // Diabetes Care. — 2010. — Vol. 33, № 3. — P. 515-519.

45. Zhang X., Gregg E.W., Williamson D.F. et al. A1C level and future risk of diabetes: a systematic review // Diabetes Care. — 2010. — Vol. 33, № 7. — P. 1665-1673.

46. Droumaguet C., Balkau B., Simon D. et al. Use of HbA1c in predicting progression to diabetes in French men and women: data from an Epidemiological Study on the Insulin Resistance Syndrome (DESIR) // Diabetes Care. — 2006. — Vol. 29, № 7. — P. 1619-1625.

47. Tabak A.G., Jokela M., Akbaraly T.N., Brunner E.J., Kivimaki M., Witte D.R. Trajectories of glycaemia, insulin sensitivity, and insulin secretion before diagnosis of type 2 diabetes: an analysis from the Whitehall II study // Lancet. — 2009. — Vol. 373, № 9682. — P. 2215-2221.

48. Selvin E., Steffes M.W., Zhu H. et al. Glycated hemoglobin, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk in nondiabetic adults // N. Engl. J. Med. — 2010. — Vol. 362, № 9. — P. 800-811.

49. Gerstein H.C., Santaguida P., Raina P. et al. Annual incidence and relative risk of diabetes in people with various categories of dysglycemia: a systematic overview and meta-analysis of prospective studies // Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. — 2007. — Vol. 78, № 3. — P. 305-312.

50. Yasuno S., Ueshima K., Oba K. et al. Is pulse pressure a predictor of new-onset diabetes in high-risk hypertensive patients? A subanalysis of the Candesartan Antihypertensive Survival Evaluation in Japan (CASE-J) trial // Diabetes Care. — 2010. — Vol. 33, № 5. — P. 1122-1127.

51. Okin P.M., Devereux R.B., Harris K.E. et al., the LIFE Study Investigators. In-treatment resolution or absence of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy is associated with decreased incidence of new onset diabetes mellitus in hypertensive patients: the Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) Study // Hypertension. — 2007. — Vol. 50, № 5. — P. 984-990.

52. Gupta A.K., Dahlof B., Dobson J., Sever P.S., Wedel H., Poulter N.R.; Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial Investigators. Determinants of new-onset diabetes among 19,257 hypertensive patients randomized in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure Lowering Arm and the Relative Influence of Antihypertensive Medication // Diabetes Care. — 2008. — Vol. 31, № 5. — P. 982-988.

53. Bangalore S., Parkar S., Grossman E., Messerli F.H. A meta-analysis of 94,492 patients with hypertension treated with beta blockers to determine the risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus // Am. J. Cardiol. — 2007. — Vol. 100, № 8. — P. 1254-1262.