Preview

"Arterial’naya Gipertenziya" ("Arterial Hypertension")

Advanced search

Modification of the daily blood pressure profile in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

https://doi.org/10.18705/1607-419X-2019-25-3-307-318

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the effect of combinations azilsartan medoxomil / chlorthalidone (Az-M/Chl) vs. perindopril / indapamide (Pr / Yn) regarding the modification of the daily blood pressure profile (BP) and augmentation index level in hypertensive patients (hypertension 2nd degree, HTN), the blood pressure profile “nondipper” or “night-peaker” and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM).

Design and methods. The study included 51 HTN (mean age 73 ± 11,7 years) patients (25 patients in the group Az-M / Chl and 26 patients in the group Pr / Yn, the groups were comparable by the main clinical parameters) with blood pressure profile “non-dipper” or “night-peaker”, DM (compensation stage). All patients have been receiving stable but ineffective antihypertensive therapy for at least 3 months before inclusion. The level of salt consumption was defined by the questionnaire “Charlton: SaltScreener”. Ambulatory 24-hour blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was performed using BPLab® device (software Vasotens, Russia) which enables analysis of central hemodynamics. Statistica 10.0 software and software R using readxl, psych, ggplot2, ggpubr, gridExtra packages were used for statistical data processing.

Results. Twenty-seven (53 %) patients reported consumption of more than 6 g of salt per day: 14 (56 %) patients in the Az-M / Chl group, and 13 (50 %) patients in the Pr / Yn group. Mean daily BP was 161,2 / 102 ± 8,77 / 9,31 mm Hg in the Az-M / Chl group, and 158,3 / 96,7 ± 10,4 / 7,21 mm Hg in the group Pr / In (p > 0,05); mean daily systolic BP (MAP) was 161,2/102,0 ± 8,8 / 9,3 mm Hg and 158,3 / 96,7 ± 10,4 / 7,2 mm Hg, respectively (p > 0,05); aortic augmentation index — 4,88 ± 15,9 % and 2,7 ± 10,9 %, respectively (p > 0,05). At randomization (baseline), the non-dipping BP profile was found in 86,3 % (n = 44) patients, and the night-peaker profile — in 13,7      % (n = 7) patients. At the final visit, all patients achieved target BP level; mean daily systolic BP was 130,2 ± 8,8 and 139,9 ± 8,2 mm Hg in the Az-M/Chl and Pr / In groups, respectively (W = 140, p-value = 0.000497). The Az-M / Chl group demonstrated a more significant reduction in arterial stiffness. In addition, in the AZ-M / Chl group, 18 (72 %) patients showed change to a dipping BP profile, while only 5 (19 %) patients demonstrated the change in the Pr / Yin group.

Conclusion. The combination of azilsartan medoxomil/chlorthalidone showed a more significant compared with the combination of perindopril/indapamide: (1) a decrease in mean blood pressure per day; (2) the effect on the modification of the daily profile of blood pressure; (3) alteration of GI in aorta.

About the Authors

D. O. Dragunov
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (RNRMU)
Russian Federation

Dmitriy O. Dragunov  MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Internal Medicine Propaedeutics, Pediatric Faculty.

25–13 Pavlovskaya str., Moscow,113093



A. V. Sokolova
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (RNRMU)
Russian Federation

Anna V Sokolova - MD, PhD, Assistant, Department of Internal Medicine Propedeutics of the Pediatric Faculty.

Moscow



G. P. Arutyunov
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (RNRMU)
Russian Federation

Grigoriy P. Arutyunov - MD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Head, Department of Internal Medicine Propaedeutics of the Pediatric Faculty.

Moscow


T. V. Latyshev
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (RNRMU)

Timofey V Latyshev - Senior Laboratory Assistant, Department of Internal Medicine Props of the Pediatric Faculty.

Moscow



References

1. Şen S, Demir M, Yiğit Z, Üresin AY Efficacy and safety of S-Amlodipine 2.5 and 5 mg/d in hypertensive patients who were treatment-naive or previously received antihypertensive monotherapy. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2018;23(4):318-328.

2. Boggia J, Li Y, Thijs L, Hansen TW, Kikuya M, Bjorklund-Bodegard K et al. Prognostic accuracy of day versus night ambulatory blood pressure: a cohort study. Lancet. 2007;370 (9594):1219-1229.

3. Nurnberger J, Keflioglu-Scheiber A, Opazo Saez AM, Wenzel RR, Philipp T, Schafers RF et al. Augmentation index is associated with cardiovascular risk. J Hypertens. 2002;20(12): 2407-2414.

4. FukudaM, Mizuno M, Yamanaka T, MotokawaM, ShirasawaY, Nishio T et al. Patients with renal dysfunction require a longer duration until blood pressure dips during the night. Hypertension. 2008;52(6):1155—1160.

5. Uzu T, Kazembe FS, Ishikawa K, Nakamura S, Inenaga T, Kimura G. High sodium sensitivity implicates nocturnal hypertension in essential hypertension. Hypertension. 1996;28(1): 139-142.

6. Uzu T, Kimura G. Diuretics shift circadian rhythm of blood pressure from nondipper to dipper in essential hypertension. Circulation. 1999;100(15):1635-1638.

7. Fukuda M, Yamanaka T, Mizuno M, Motokawa M, Shirasawa Y, Miyagi S et al. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker, olmesartan, restores nocturnal blood pressure decline by enhancing daytime natriuresis. J Hypertens. 2008;26(3):583-588.

8. Rakugi H, Enya K, Sugiura K, Ikeda Y. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of azilsartan with that of candesartan cilexetil in Japanese patients with grade I-II essential hypertension: a randomized, double-blind clinical study. Hypertens Res. 2012;35(5): 552-558.

9. Cushman WC, Bakris GL, White WB, Weber MA, Sica D, Roberts A et al. Azilsartan medoxomil plus chlorthalidone reduces blood pressure more effectively than olmesartan plus hydrochlorothiazide in stage 2 systolic hypertension. Hypertension. 2012;60(2):310-318.

10. Anderson VR, Perry CM, Robinson DM. Ramipril: A Review of its Use in Preventing Cardiovascular Outcomes in High-Risk Patients. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2006;6(6):417-432.

11. Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(3):145-153.

12. Azilsartan compared to ACE inhibitors in anti-hypertensive therapy: one-year outcomes of the observational EARLY registry for the EARLY Registry Group et al. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016;16(1):56. doi:10.1186/s12872-016-0222-6

13. Sowers JR, Zemel MB. Clinical implications of hypertension in the diabetic patient. Am J Hypertens. 1990;3(5 Pt 1): 415-424.

14. White WB, Cuadra RH, Lloyd E, Bakris GL, Kupfer S. Effects of azilsartan medoxomil compared with olmesartan and valsartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes and prediabetes. J Hypertens. 2016;34 (4):788-797.

15. Bakris GL, Sica D, White WB, Cushman WC, Weber MA, Handley A et al. Antihypertensive efficacy of hydrochlorothiazide vs chlorthalidone combined with azilsartan medoxomil. Am J Med. 2012;125(12):1229.e1-1229.e10.

16. Charlton KE, Steyn K, Levitt NS, Jonathan D, Zulu JV, Nel JH. Development and validation of a short questionnaire to assess sodium intake. Public Health Nutr. 2008;11(1):83—94.

17. Kidney International Supplements | KDIGO 2012 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease | ScienceDirect. com [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/kidney-international-supplements/vol/3/issue/1 (accessed: 26.01.2018).

18. Preobrazhenskiy DV, Sidorenko BA, Marenich AV Diuretics in treatment of hypertension. Consilium-medicum. Consilium Provisorum. 2002;2 (1):22-24. In Russian.

19. Paul M, Poyan Mehr A, Kreutz R. Physiology of local renin-angiotensin systems. Physiol Rev. 2006;86(3):747-803.

20. Kobori H, Nangaku M, Navar LG, Nishiyama A. The intrarenal renin-angiotensin system: from physiology to the pathobiology of hypertension and kidney disease. Pharmacol Rev. 2007;59(3):251-287.

21. Roson MI, Cavallero S, Della Penna S, Cao G, Gorzalczany S, Pandolfo M et al. Acute sodium overload produces renal tubulo interstitial inflammation in normal rats. Kidney Int. 2006;70(8): 1439-1446.

22. Chirinos JA, Townsend R. Sodium, potassium, and target organ damage: a case for central hemodynamics. Hypertension. 2010;56(4):578-580.

23. Oberleithner H. Two barriers for sodium in vascular endothelium? Ann Med. 2012;44(Suppl 1): S143-S148.

24. Fukuda M, Munemura M, Usami T, Nakao N, Takeuchi O, Kamiya Y et al. Nocturnal blood pressure is elevated with natriuresis and proteinuria as renal function deteriorates in nephropathy. Kidney Int. 2004;65(2):621-625.

25. Jacobsen PK, Rossing P, Parving HH. Impact of renin angiotensin system blockade on night to day blood pressure ratio in diabetic nephropathy. Nephrol Dial. Transplant. 2006;21(7): 2030-2031.

26. Sokolova AV, Dragunov DO, Arutyunov GP. Urine conductivity as a screening test to detect an adverse circadian blood pressure profile. Clinical Nephrology. 2017;1:36-41. In Russian.

27. Isobe-Sasaki Y, Fukuda M, Ogiyama Y, Sato R, Miura T, Fuwa D et al. Sodium balance, circadian BP rhythm, heart rate variability, and intrarenal renin-angiotensin-aldosterone and dopaminergic systems in acute phase of ARB therapy. Physiol Rep. 2017;5(11): e13309.

28. Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, Muntner P, Whelton PK, He J. Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data. Lancet. 2005;365(9455):217-223.


Review

For citations:


Dragunov D.O., Sokolova A.V., Arutyunov G.P., Latyshev T.V. Modification of the daily blood pressure profile in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. "Arterial’naya Gipertenziya" ("Arterial Hypertension"). 2019;25(3):307-318. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18705/1607-419X-2019-25-3-307-318

Views: 1438


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1607-419X (Print)
ISSN 2411-8524 (Online)