Arterial hypertension and antihypertensive treatment in the unorganized Moscow population
https://doi.org/10.18705/1607-419X-2020-26-1-43-52
Abstract
Background. The epidemiology of hypertension (HTN) and antihypertensive treatment (AHT) in the Russian Federation was repeatedly estimated in epidemiology trials with various methodology, but situation in Moscow region has not been fully explored.
Objective. To examine the rate, age and gender features of HTN and AHT in unorganized Moscow cohort.
Design and methods. 532 participants older than 16 years old were interviewed in Moscow park after signing informed consent. Information about sex, age, rate of diagnosed HTN, AHT and its effectiveness was collected based on a questionnaire. Arterial blood pressure (BP) was measured consequently three times.
Results. Median and interquartile range of participants age was 57 (38–66) years, 71,1 % were women. Women were significantly older than men (59 (46–67) and 48 (31–61) years respectively, p = 0,0001). 42,7 % reported previously diagnosed HTN, 62,5 % received AHT. 79,7 % participants receiving AHT (49,8 % HTN patients) considered it effective. Home BP self-monitoring was performed by 43,7 % respondents (sex- and age-adjusted rates). While measured, 29,7 % participants had optimal BP level, 22,6 % — normal and 15,2 % — high normal. BP > 140 and/or 90 mm Hg was measured in 32,6 % of participants (rates are sex and age adjusted). BP > 140 / 90 mm Hg at assessment was found in 48,8 % HTN patients and 16,4 % participants without previously diagnosed HTN (8,7 % in entire studied cohort). There were no significant differences in the rate increased BP level at assessment and in HTN patients who received AHT or not (49,5 and 46,9 %). HTN rate was 39,6 % in participants who considered their AHT effective, and 75,5 % — ineffective, p < 0,0001. 63,4 % participants taking AHT could specify the drugs (65,3 % received monotherapy, 27,1 % — 2 drugs and 7,6 % — 3 drugs; fixed combinations received 17 %). BP levels and HTN did not differ in HTN patients who received one or more drugs.
Conclusions. In unorganized Moscow cohort age and gender adjusted rate of HTN at BP measurement was 32,6 %. In 8,7 % participants high BP was detected at first time. Only 62,5 % patients with previously diagnosed HTN received AHT. 39,6 % participants who considered AHT effective demonstrate high BP at assessment. AHT was not associated with the lower HTN rate or BP level, which may be attributed to excessive use of monotherapy and insufficient application of fixed combinations.
About the Authors
A. V. MelekhovRussian Federation
Aleksander V. Melekhov, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Internal Diseases Department № 2
10, building 2, room 720, Pistsovaya street, Moscow, 117997
A. I. Agaeva
Russian Federation
Anastasiya I. Agaeva, Student
Moscow
V. A. Kuznetsova
Russian Federation
Veronika A. Kuznetsova, Student
Moscow
A. A. Dubov
Russian Federation
Aleksandr A. Dubov, Student
Moscow
A. D. Nakonechnya
Russian Federation
Anna D. Nakonechnaya, Student
Moscow
V. A. Nakonechny
Russian Federation
Vladislav A. Nakonechny, Student
Moscow
P. O. Polevyanova
Russian Federation
Polina O. Polevyanova, Student
Moscow
E. S. Svirina
Russian Federation
Elizaveta S. Svirina, Student
Moscow
A. S. Tuchkova
Russian Federation
Anastasiya S. Tuchkova, Student
Moscow
I. G. Nikitin
Russian Federation
Igor G. Nikitin, MD, PhD, Professor, Head, Internal Diseases Department № 2
Moscow
References
1. Boytsov SA, Deyev AD, Shalnova SA. Mortality and risk factors of noninfectious diseases in Russia: features, dynamics, forecast. Ther Arch. 2017;89(1):5–13. In Russian.
2. Health care in Russia, statistical compendium. 2017. Moscow. 21 p. In Russian.
3. Muromtseva GA, Koncevaya AV, Konstantinov VV, Artamonova GV, Gatagonova TM, Duplyakov DV et al. Prevalence of risk factors of noninfectious diseases in the Russian population in 2012– 2013. Results of the research ESSE-RF. Cardiovascular therapy and prevention. 2014;13(6):4–11. In Russian.
4. Shalnova SA, Balanova YA, Konstantinov VV, Timofeeva TN, Ivanov VM, Kapustina AV et al. Arterial hypertension: prevalence, awareness, antihypertensive pharmaceutical treatment, treatment effectiveness in Russian population. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2006;(4):45–50. https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2006-4-45-50. In Russian.
5. Fomin IV, Badin YuV, Polyakov DS, Belenkov YuN, Mareev VYu, Ageev FT et al. Prehypertension: what is the prevalence of this condition of a cardiovascular system in citizens of the European part of Russia (these researches EPOHA-AG, 2002–2007). Klinicheskaya Meditsina = Clinical Medicine. 2013;5(2):38–46. In Russian.
6. Boytsov SA, Balanova YA, Shalnova SA, Deev AD, Artamonova GV, Gatagonova TM et al. Arterial hypertension among individuals of 25–64 years old: prevalence, awareness, treatment and control. By the data from ESSE. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2014;13(4):4–14. https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2014-4-4-14. In Russian.
7. Erina AM, Rotar OP, Orlov AV, Solntsev VN, Shalnova SA, Deyev AD et al. Prehypertension and cardiometabolic risk factors (on materials of the research ESSE-RF). Arterial’naya Gipertenziya = Arterial Hypertension. 2017;23(3):243–252. In Russian.
8. Shalnova SA, Konradi AO, Balanova YuA, Deyev AD, Imayeva AE, Muromtseva GA et al. on behalf of researchers of the ESSE-RF. What factors influence of arterial hypertension control in Russia. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2018;17(4):53–60. In Russian.
9. Krivoshapova KE, Tsygankova DP, Barbarash OL. Prevalence, awareness and adherence to treatment of arterial hypertension: myths and reality. Systemnye Gipertenzii = Systemic Hypertension. 2018;15(1):63–67. doi:10.26442/2075-082X_15.1.63-67 In Russian.
10. Erina AM, Rotar OP, Solntsev VN, Harchenko AV, Mihin VP, Konradi AO et al. Prehypertension and cardiovascular risk factors in Kursk. Arterial’naya Gipertenziya = Arterial Hypertension. 2012;18(6):523–530. In Russian.
11. Pravkina EA, Nikulina NN, Luk’yanov MM, Martsevich SYu, Vorob’ev AN, Zagrebel’ny AV et al. The quality of examination of patients with arterial hypertension based at outpatient facilities. Klinicheskaya Meditsina = Clinical Medicine. 2015;93(9): 36–42. In Russian.
12. Semenova ON, Naumova EA, Bulaeva Yu V. The prevalence of hypertension and adherence to its treatment among a wide audience of social networks: results from the internet survey. Kardiologiya: novosti, mneniya, obuchenie. = Cardiology: News, Opinions, Training. 2019;7(1):15–23. doi:110.24411/2309-1908-2019-11002. In Russian.
13. Babenko AI, Tomtchuk AL, Bravve YuI, Babenko YeA, Nikiforov DB. The social hygienic assessment of pathological affectedness of population. Problemy Sotsialnoi Gigieny, Zdravookhraneniya i Istorii Meditsiny = Problems of Social Hygiene, Healthcare and History of Medicine. 2012;5:6–9. In Russian.
14. Diagnostics and treatment of arterial hypertension. Clinical recommendations. Kardiologicheskiy Vestnik = Cardiology Bulletin. 2015;10(1):5–30. In Russian.
15. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(33):3021–3104. doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339
Review
For citations:
Melekhov A.V., Agaeva A.I., Kuznetsova V.A., Dubov A.A., Nakonechnya A.D., Nakonechny V.A., Polevyanova P.O., Svirina E.S., Tuchkova A.S., Nikitin I.G. Arterial hypertension and antihypertensive treatment in the unorganized Moscow population. "Arterial’naya Gipertenziya" ("Arterial Hypertension"). 2020;26(1):43-52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18705/1607-419X-2020-26-1-43-52