Validation of cardio-ankle vascular index as a marker of risk of stroke in older adults in St Petersburg and Bashkortostan
https://doi.org/10.18705/1607-419X-2019-25-3-258-266
Abstract
Background. Arterial stiffness is an independent prognostic factor for cardiovascular events and target organ damage related to hypertension.
Objective. To determine the rate of age-related increase of cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) and to investigate the association between CAVI and cardiovascular events in older adults.
Design and methods. This cross-sectional study was conducted on 200 older adults aged 60+ in Bashkortostan and St Petersburg. The following parameters were assessed: arterial stiffness (CAVI assessed by Vascular Screening System VaSera VS-1500), anthropometry, medical history and laboratory tests (glucose, lipids).
Results. The CAVI is nonlinearly associated with age. In Bashkortostan, it was determined using the following equation: Mean ± SD (women) = (7,5454 + 0,01426 × age + 0,000002445 × age3) ± (-11,8225 + 0,3681 x age — 0,002621 × age2); Mean ± SD (men) = (12,1277-0,06924 × age + 0,000006745 × age3) ± (12,52380,2833 × age + 0,001730 × age2). The equation was validated in St Petersburg. CAVI was a higher predicting score in patients with a history of stroke than in those without a history of stroke. An increase in CAVI by 1 unit was associated with the 1,5-fold higher probability of a stroke in history, even after adjusting for age, gender and multimorbidity [odds ratio (95 % confidence interval) = 1,66 (1,16-2.38)].
Conclusion. We determined the rate of CAVI score increase with age. We developed and validated a new equation to predict CAVI in older adults in different age. We defined the values of CAVI score associated with the history of stroke in adults aged 60 years and older.
About the Authors
A. V. TurushevaRussian Federation
Anna V Turusheva - MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Family Medicine.
45 Prosvescheniya av., St Petersburg, 194275
Yu. V. Kotovskaya
Yulia V. Kotovskaya - MD, PhD, Professor, Deputy Director on Research, Russian Clinical and Research Center of Gerontology.
Moscow
E. V. Frolova
Elena V. Frolova - MD, PhD, Professor, Department of Family Medicine.
St PetersburgG. V. Kiseleva
Galina V. Kiseleva - MD, Postgraduate Student, Department of Family Medicine.
St Petersburg
References
1. Marzona I, O’Donnell M, Teo K, Gao P, Anderson C, Bosch J et al. Increased risk of cognitive and functional decline in patients with atrial fibrillation: results of the ONTARGET and TRANSCEND studies. Can Med Assoc J. 2012;184(6):E329-36.
2. Kucharska-Newton A, Griswold M, Yao ZH, Foraker R, Rose K, Rosamond W et al. Cardiovascular disease and patterns of change in functional status over 15 years: findings from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(3). pii: e004144. doi:10.1161/JAHA.n6.004144
3. Mortensen MB, Falk E. Limitations of the SCORE-guided European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(29):2259-2263.
4. de Ruijter W, Westendorp RWJ, Assendelft WJJ, den Elzen WP, de Craen AJ, le Cessie S et al. Use of Framingham risk score and newbiomarkers to predict cardiovascular mortality in older people: population based observational cohort study. Br Med J. 2009;338: a3083. doi:10.1136/bmj.a3083
5. Poortvliet RK, de Ruijter W, de Craen AJ, Mooijaart SP, Westendorp RG, Assendelft WJ et al. Blood pressure trends and mortality: the Leiden 85-plus Study. J Hypertens. 2013;31(1):6 3—70. doi:10.1097/HJH.0b013e32835aa351
6. Rodondi N1, Locatelli I, Aujesky D, Butler J, Vittinghoff E, Simonsick E et al. Health ABC Study. Framingham risk score and alternatives for prediction of coronary heart disease in older adults. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e34287. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034287
7. D’Agostino RB, Grundy S, Sullivan LM, Wilson P. Validation of the Framingham coronary heart disease prediction scores: results of a multiple ethnic groups investigation. J Am Med Assoc. 2001;286(2):180-187.
8. Turusheva A, Frolova E, Hegendoerfer E, Degryse JM. Predictors of short-term mortality, cognitive and physical decline in older adults in northwest Russia: a population-based prospective cohort study. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017;29(4): 665-673. doi:10.1007/s40520-016-0613-7
9. Milyagin VA, Milyagina IV, Abramenkova NYu, Otrokhova EV, Grekova MV, Kopteva VV et al. Noninvasive methods of vascular studies. Smolensk, 2012. 224 p. In Russian.
10. Namekata T, Suzuki K, Ishizuka N, Shirai K. Establishing baseline criteria of cardio-ankle vascular index as a new indicator of arteriosclerosis: a cross-sectional study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2011;10 (11):51.
11. Suzuki J, Sakakibara R, Tomaru T, Tateno F, Kishi M, Ogawa E, Kurosu T et al. Stroke and cardio-ankle vascular stiffness index. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;22(2):171-5.
12. Sakakibara R, Suzuki J, Tsuyusaki Y, Tateno F, Kishi M, Tomaru T. Stroke and cardio-ankle vascular stiffness index: a clinical use. J Neurol Disord Stroke. 2014; 2(2):1037.
13. Matsushita K, Ding N, Kim ED, Budoff M, Chirinos JA, Fernhall B et al. Cardio-ankle vascular index and cardiovascular disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective and cross-sectional studies. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019;21(1): 16-24.
14. Mitchell GF. Arterial stiffness and hypertension: chicken or egg? Hypertension. 2014;64(2):210-4.
15. Bavishi C, Goel S, Messerli FH. Isolated systolic hypertension: an update after SPRINT. Am J Med. 2016;129(12): 1251-1258.
16. Chung CM, Cheng HW, Chang JJ, Lin YS, Hsiao JF, Chang ST et al. Relationship between resistant hypertension and arterial stiffness assessed by brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity in the older patient. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:1495-502.
17. Qiao A, Song X, Peng K, Du G, Li G, Chen Z. Validity of CAVI measurements for diagnosing hypertension in middle-aged and elderly patients and correlations of these measurements with relevant factors. Technol Health Care. 2017;25(S1):125-134.
18. Васюк Ю. А., Иванова С. В., Школьник Е. Л., Котовская Ю. В., Милягин В. А. Согласованное мнение российских экспертов по оценке артериальной жесткости в клинической практике. Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика. 2016;15 (2):4-19.
19. Senile asthenia. Clinical guidelines. 2018. URL: http://www.rgnkc.ru/images/projects_documents/Asteniya_recomend_13122018.pdf. Access on 25.01.2019. In Russian.
20. Kurata M, Okura T, Watanabe S, Irita J, Enomoto D, Johtoku M et al. Effects of amlodipine and candesartan on arterial stiffness estimated by cardio-ankle vascular index in patients with essential hypertension: a 24-week study. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2008;69(5):412-22. doi:10.1016/j.curtheres.2008.10.002
21. Sasaki H, Saiki A, Endo K, Ban N, Yamaguchi T, Kawana H et al. Protective effects of efonidipine, a T- and L-type calcium channel blocker, on renal function and arterial stiffness in type 2 diabetic patients with hypertension and nephropathy. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2009;16(5):568-75.
Review
For citations:
Turusheva A.V., Kotovskaya Yu.V., Frolova E.V., Kiseleva G.V. Validation of cardio-ankle vascular index as a marker of risk of stroke in older adults in St Petersburg and Bashkortostan. "Arterial’naya Gipertenziya" ("Arterial Hypertension"). 2019;25(3):258-266. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18705/1607-419X-2019-25-3-258-266