Renal sympathetic denervation in patients with resistant hypertension. Results of long-term prospective follow-up

Objective. Renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) is one of the invasive treatment options for the patients with hypertension (HTN) who are resistant to antihypertensive therapy (AHT). The short-term efficacy of RDN has been proven in a number of randomized clinical trials, but remains controversial, the data on its long-term efficacy are limited. The aim of our study was to evaluate the natural course of HTN, to assess long-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and other outcomes, as well as AHT efficacy and its features in patients with resistant HTN after bilateral RDN during extended prospective follow-up. Design and methods. We included 22 patients with truly resistant HTN (median 57 y. o., 9 males), in whom RDN was performed during 2012–2015 in the clinical center of excellence. We assessed initial and further (after 1 year and after ≥ 5 years) clinical, laboratory and anthropometric parameters, as well as detailed AHT history. Long-term MACE and other clinically significant outcomes were recorded. At baseline and follow-up, the quality of life (QoL) was determined with the use of EQ-5D questionnaire at all time points. Multiple linear regression was used to find possible predictors of the efficacy of RDN. Results. A significant and sustained drop in office and ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was observed at 12 months after RDN compared to baseline values (∆ –24 and –12 mm Hg, p < 0,005; ∆ –10 and –7 mm Hg, p < 0,05, respectively). There were 7 patients with office SBP on-target, and 12 patients were considered responders (∆ SBP > 10 mm Hg). These numbers increased to 10 and 14 patients after ≥ 5 years after RDN. A causal relationship between changes in office SBP was found only for the baseline SBP (β -0,6, p = 0,02). No differences in the number of medications were noted during follow-up (4,4; 4,1 and 4,1 drugs, p = 0,41). During the follow-up 10 MACE occurred and 5 patients were diagnosed with various types of cancer; there were no fatal outcomes. The QoL significantly improved a year after RDN (+9,7 points, p = 0,01), however, a negative trend was observed in the next 5 years with return to reference level. No association was observed between BP and QoL changes at two timepoints. Conclusions. The RDN shows a pronounced clinical effect in patients with resistant HTN up to 5 years, and is not accompanied by an AHT intensification, but is not associated with QoL changes. The initial positive trend for QoL completely harked back after 5 years which may be associated with the development of MACE. The only predictor of RDN positive effect is baseline SBP level.

1. Yusuf S, Wood D, Ralston J, Reddy KS. The World Heart Federation’s vision for worldwide cardiovascular disease prevention. Lancet. 2015;386(9991):399–402. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60265-3

2. Egan BM, Kjeldsen SE, Grassi G, Esler M, Mancia G. The global burden of hypertension exceeds 1.4 billion people: should a systolic blood pressure target below 130 become the universal standard? J Hypertens. 2019;37(6):1148–1153. doi:10.1097/HJH.0000000000002021

3. Carey RM, Calhoun DA, Bakris GL, Brook RD, Daugherty SL, Dennison-Himmelfarb CR et al. Resistant hypertension: detection, evaluation, and management: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension. 2018;72(5):e53– e90. doi:10.1161/HYP.0000000000000084

4. Shaw JA, Warren JL. Resistant hypertension and renal denervation where to now? Cardiovasc Ther. 2015;33(1):9–14. doi:10.1111/1755-5922.12103

5. Gulati R, Raphael CE, Negoita M, Pocock SJ, Gersh BJ. The rise, fall, and possible resurrection of renal denervation. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016;13(4):238–44. doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2016.1

6. Schlaich MP, Schmieder RE, Bakris G, Blankestijn PJ, Böhm M, Campese VM et al. International expert consensus statement: Percutaneous transluminal renal denervation for the treatment of resistant hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(22):2031–2045. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1616

7. Bhatt DL, Kandzari DE, O’Neill WW, D’Agostino R, Flack JM, Katzen BT et al. A controlled trial of renal denervation for resistant hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(15):1393–1401. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1402670

8. Ott C, Schmieder RE. Renal denervation for resistant hypertension: past, present, and future. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2015;17(8):65. doi:10.1007/s11906-015-0577-6

9. Ukena C, Cremers B, Ewen S, Böhm M, Mahfoud F. Response and non-response to renal denervation: who is the ideal candidate? EuroIntervention. 2013;9 Suppl R: R 54–R 57. doi:10.4244/EIJV9SRA10

10. Kandzari DE, Böhm M, Mahfoud F, Townsend RR, Weber MA, Pocock S et al. Effect of renal denervation on blood pressure in the presence of antihypertensive drugs: 6-month efficacy and safety results from the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED proof-ofconcept randomised trial. Lancet. 2018;391(10137):2346–2355. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30951-6

11. Böhm M, Kario K, Kandzari DE, Mahfoud F, Weber MA, Schmieder RE et al. Efficacy of catheter-based renal denervation in the absence of antihypertensive medications (SPYRAL HTNOFF MED Pivotal): a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial. Lancet. 2020;395(10234):1444–1451. doi:10.1016/S 0140-6736(20)30554-7

12. Azizi M, Sapoval M, Gosse P, Monge M, Bobrie G, Delsart P et al. Optimum and stepped care standardised anti-hypertensive treatment with or without renal denervation for resistant hypertension (DENERHTN): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9981):1957–1965. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61942-5

13. Symplicity HTN-1 Investigators. Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation for resistant hypertension: durability of blood pressure reduction out to 24 months. Hypertension. 2011;57(5):911–917. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.163014

14. Krum H, Schlaich MP, Sobotka PA, Böhm M, Mahfoud F, Rocha-Singh K et al. Percutaneous renal denervation in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension: final 3-year report of the Symplicity HTN-1 study. Lancet. 2014;383(9917):622–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62192-3

15. Mahfoud F, Böhm M, Schmieder R, Narkiewicz K, Ewen S, Ruilope L et al. Effects of renal denervation on kidney function and long-term outcomes: 3-year follow-up from the Global SYMPLICITY Registry. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(42):3474–3482. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz118

16. Ionov MV, Zhukova OV, Yudina YS, Avdonina NG, Emelyanov IV, Kurapeev DI et al. Value-based approach to blood pressure telemonitoring and remote counseling in hypertensive patients. Blood Press. 2020:1–11. doi:10.1080/08037051.2020.1813015

17. Sardar P, Bhatt DL, Kirtane AJ, Kennedy KF, Chatterjee S, Giri J et al. Sham-controlled randomized trials of catheter-based renal denervation in patients with hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(13):1633–1642. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.12.082

18. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(33):3021– 3104. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339

19. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, Redon J, Zanchetti A, Böhm M et al. 2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2013;34(28):2159–2219. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht151

20. Parati G, Stergiou G, O’Brien E, Asmar R, Beilin L, Bilo G et al. European society of hypertension practice guidelines for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Hypertens. 2014;32(7):1359–1366. doi:10.1097/HJH.0000000000000221

21. The questionnaire about health (EQ-5D-5L). Russian vesion. URL: https://scardio.ru/content/activities/2016/Russia_(Russian)_EQ-5D-5L.pdf. Access date: 14.12.2020. In Russian.

22. Panarina SA, Yudina YuS, Ionov MV, Avdonina NG, Emelyanov IV, Vasileva EU et al. Impact of aggressive blood pressure reduction on kidney function after renal denervation: long-term outcome. Arterial’naya Gipertenziya = Arterial Hypertension. 2020;26(1):94– 106. doi:10.18705/1607-419X-2020-26-1-94-106. In Russian.

23. Esler MD, Böhm M, Sievert H, Rump CL, Schmieder RE, Krum H et al. Catheter-based renal denervation for treatment of patients with treatment-resistant hypertension: 36 month results from the SYMPLICITY HTN-2 randomized clinical trial. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(26):1752–1759. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu209

24. Danilov NM, Matchin YuG, Chazova IE. Endovascular radiofrequency denervation of renal arteries as an innovation method of treatment of refractory arterial hypertension: first experience in Russia. Angiology and Vascular Surgery. 2012;18(1):51–54. In Russian.

25. Agaeva RA, Danilov NM, Shelkova GV, Sagaydak OV, Grigin VA, Matchin UG et al. Radiofrequency renal denervation with different device for treatment in patient with uncontrolled hypertension. Syst Hypertens. 2018;15(4):34–38. doi:10.26442/2075082X.2018.4.000043. In Russian.

26. Gapon LI, Mikova EV, Savelyeva NYu, Kolumin GV, Zherzhova AYu. Clinical efficacy of sympathetic denervation of renal arteries in patients with resistant arterial hypertension as part of annual prospective follow-up. Syst Hypertens. 2017;14(2):41–44. doi:10.26442/2075-082X_14.2.41-44. In Russian.

27. Glybochko PV, Svetankova AA, Rodionov AV, Maltseva AS, Sulimov VA, Fomin VV. Renal denervation with a resistant arterial hypertension: the results of a five-year follow-up. Ter Arkh. 2018;90(9):88–91. doi:10.26442/terarkh201890988-91. In Russian.

28. Mahfoud F, Bakris G, Bhatt DL, Esler M, Ewen S, Fahy M et al. Reduced blood pressure-lowering effect of catheter-based renal denervation in patients with isolated systolic hypertension: data from SYMPLICITY HTN-3 and the Global SYMPLICITY Registry. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(2):93–100. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw325

29. Kandzari DE, Mahfoud F, Bhatt DL, Böhm M, Weber MA, Townsend RR et al. Confounding factors in renal denervation trials. Hypertension. 2020;76(5):1410–1417. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15745

30. Lambert GW, Hering D, Esler MD, Marusic P, Lambert EA, Tanamas SK et al. Health-related quality of life after renal denervation in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension. Hypertension. 2012;60(6):1479–1484. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.112.200865

31. Ionov MV, Zvartau NE, Dubinina EA, Khromov-Borisov NN, Tregubenko IA, Konradi A. O. Hypertension specific patient-reported outcome measure. Part III: validation, responsiveness and reliability assessment. Russ J Card. 2020;25(3):109–120. doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2020-3-3438. In Russian.

32. Papademetriou V, Stavropoulos K, Doumas M, Tsioufis K. Now that renal denervation works, how do we proceed? Circ Res. 2019;124(5):693–695. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.119.314695

33. Gupta A, Prince M, Bob-Manuel T, Jenkins JS. Renal denervation: alternative treatment options for hypertension? Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2020;63(1):51–57. doi:10.1016/j.pcad.2019.12.007