Preview

"Arterial’naya Gipertenziya" ("Arterial Hypertension")

Advanced search

Antihypertensive drugs pharmacokinetics evaluation for predicting blood pressure control in comorbid hypertensive patients

https://doi.org/10.18705/1607-419X-2026-2526

EDN: XWMHFS

Abstract

Background. Evaluation of the effect of antihypertensive drug (AHD) concentrations on blood pressure (BP) in comorbid patients may help optimize the treatment of arterial hypertension (HTN).
The aim of the study was the effect of the AHD (lisinopril, amlodipine, indapamide) concentration assessment on BP in comorbid HTN patients to optimize antihypertensive therapy.
Design and methods. A prospective clinical controlled study was performed. In comorbid patients with essential HTN and regular use of lisinopril, amlodipine and indapamide, fasting blood samples were taken to determine the concentration of AHD using high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Comorbidity was assessed by Charlson index.
Results. In this study 183 patients were enrolled, the mean age was 63,4 ± 11,1 years, 42,6 % were men. The analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) showed that a decrease in the concentration of each of the studied AHD below the therapeutic range (TR) did not affect the magnitude of daytime and nighttime systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP). At the same time, blood pressure in patients whose concentrations of the two drugs amlodipine and indapamide were recorded below TR, the levels of daytime DBP, nighttime SBP and DBP were statistically significantly (p < 0,05) higher than those in patients with concentrations of all AHD within TR. In one patient concentrations of all three drugs were below TR, and SBP day level was 164 mmHg, DBP day — 102 mmHg, SBP night — 157 mmHg, DBP night — 97 mmHg.
Conclusion. Our results indicate that the decrease in the concentration below TR of at least two antihypertensive drugs (amlodipine and indapamide in our study) affects the level of BP. Analysis of the concentration of AHD in HTN patients may be useful and can increase the treatment effectiveness.

About the Authors

S. V. Seleznev
Ryazan State Medical University
Russian Federation

Sergey V. Seleznev, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Therapy with the Course of Medico-Social Expertise

9 Vysokovoltnaya str., Ryazan, 390026



A. V. Shchulkin
Ryazan State Medical University
Russian Federation

Alexey V. Shchulkin, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Pharmacology Department

Ryazan



P. Yu. Mylnikov
Ryazan State Medical University
Russian Federation

Pavel Yu. Mylnikov, PhD, Associate Professor, Pharmacology Department

Ryazan



S. S. Yakushin
Ryazan State Medical University
Russian Federation

Sergey S. Yakushin, MD, PhD, Professor, Head, Department of Therapy with the Course of Medico-Social Expertise

Ryazan



References

1. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants [published correction appears in Lancet. 2022;399(10324):520. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00061-7]. Lancet. 2021;398(10304):957–980. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01330-1

2. Balanova YuA, Shalnova SA, Imaeva AE, Kapustina АV, Muromtseva GA, Evstifeeva SV, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in Russian Federation (data of observational ESSERF-2 study). Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2019;15(4):450–466. https://doi.org/10.20996/1819-6446-2019-15-4-450-466

3. Daugherty SL, Powers JD, Magid DJ, Tavel HM, Masoudi FA, Margolis KL, et al. Incidence and prognosis of resistant hypertension in hypertensive patients. Circulation. 2012;125(13):1635–1642. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.068064

4. Sim JJ, Bhandari SK, Shi J, Reynolds K, Calhoun DA, Kalantar-Zadeh K, et al. Comparative risk of renal, cardiovascular, and mortality outcomes in controlled, uncontrolled resistant, and nonresistant hypertension. Kidney Int. 2015;88(3):622–632. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2015.142

5. Bangalore S, Bhatt DL, Steg PG, Weber MA, Boden WE, Hamm CW, et al. β-blockers and cardiovascular events in patients with and without myocardial infarction: post hoc analysis from the CHARISMA trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014;7(6):872–881. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001073

6. Kobalava ZhD, Konradi AO, Nedogoda SV, Shlyakhto EV, Arutyunov GP, Baranova EI, 2024 Clinical practice guidelines for hypertension in adults. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2024;29(9):6117. https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2024-6117

7. De Geest S, Sabaté E. Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2003;2(4):323. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-5151(03)00091-4

8. Egan BM, Zhao Y, Li J, Brzezinski WA, Todoran TM, Brook RD, et al. Prevalence of optimal treatment regimens in patients with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension based on office blood pressure in a community-based practice network. Hypertension. 2013;62:691–697. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.01448

9. Levy D, DeStefano AL, Larson MG, O'Donnell CJ, Lifton RP, Gavras H, et al. Evidence for a gene influencing blood pressure on chromosome 17. Genome scan linkage results for longitudinal blood pressure phenotypes in subjects from the Framingham Heart Study. Hypertension. 2000;36(4):477–483. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.hyp.36.4.477

10. Соколов А.В. Терапевтический лекарственный мониторинг. Качественная клиническая практика. 2002;(1):78–88 Sokolov AV. Therapeutic drug monitoring. Kachestvennaja Klinicheskaja Praktika. 2002;(1):78–88. (In Russ).

11. Rognstad S, Søraas CL, Bergland OU, Høieggen A, Strømmen M, Helland A, et al. Establishing serum reference ranges for antihypertensive drugs. Ther Drug Monit. 2021;43(1):116–125. https://doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000000806

12. Ensom MH, Davis GA, Cropp CD, Ensom RJ. Clinical pharmacokinetics in the 21st century. Does the evidence support definitive outcomes? Clin Pharmacokinet. 1998;34(4):265–279. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-199834040-00001

13. Bochner F, Tonkin A. The clinician and therapeutic drug monitoring in the 1990s. Med J Aust. 1993;158(6):422–426. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1993.tb121842.x

14. Reynolds DJ, Aronson JK. ABC of monitoring drug therapy: making the most of plasma drug concentration measurements. Br Med J. 1993;306:48–51. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.306.6869.48

15. Versmissen J, van Steenkiste J, Koch BCP, Peeters LEJ. “Under pressure”: The role of therapeutic drug monitoring in the treatment of hypertension. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2024;90(8):1884–1891. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.16125

16. Belousov IuB, Gurevich KG. Clinical pharmacokinetics: the practice of drug dosing: a special issue of the series “Rational pharmacotherapy”. M.: Litterra, 2005. 288 p. (In Russ.)

17. Kobalava ZhD, Konradi AO, Nedogoda SV, Shlyakhto EV, Arutyunov GP, Baranova EI. Arterial hypertension in adults. Clinical guidelines 2020. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020;25(3):3786. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2020-3-3786

18. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8

19. Drapkina OM, Livzan MA, Martynov AI, Moiseev SV, Nikolaev NA, Skirdenko YuP. The first Russian expert consensus on the quantitative evaluation of the treatment adherence: pivotal issues, algorithms and recommendations. Medical News of North Caucasus. 2018;13(1.2):259–271. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14300/mnnc.2018.13039

20. Mylnikov PY, Shchulkin AV, Seleznev SV, Popova NM, Yakushin SS, Yakusheva EN. Method for quantitative determination of antihypertensive medicinal substances in blood plasma: patent 2803887 Russian Federation. No. 2022124978; filed 23.09.2022; published 21.09.2023, Bull. No. 27.-7 p. (In Russ.)

21. Мylnikov PY, Tranova Y, Shul'kin AV, Seleznev SV, Yakushin SS, Yakusheva EN. Development and validation of a method for quantitative determination of metoprolol in blood plasma of patients by HPLC-MS/MS. Eruditio Juvenium. 2022;10(4):361–372. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23888/HMJ2022104361-372

22. Regenthal R, Krueger M, Koeppel C, Preiss R. Drug levels: therapeutic and toxic serum/plasma concentrations of common drugs. J Сlin Monit Comput. 1999;15(7–8):529–544. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009935116877

23. Schiavi P, Jochemsen R, Guez D. Pharmacokinetics of sustained and immediate release formulations of indapamide after single and repeated oral administration in healthy volunteers. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2000;14(2):139–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-8206.2000.tb00402.x

24. Ates HC, Roberts JA, Lipman J, Cass AEG, Urban GA, Dincer C. On-site therapeutic drug monitoring. Trends Biotechnol. 2020;38:1262–1277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.03.001

25. Rathore SS. Association of serum digoxin concentration and outcomes in patients with heart failure. J Am Med Assoc. 2003;289(7):871. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.7.871

26. Sun S, Wang M, Su L, Li J, Li H, Gu D. Study on warfarin plasma concentration and its correlation with international normalized ratio. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2006;42(2):218–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2006.03.019

27. Wieland E, Shipkova M. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug monitoring of direct-acting oral anticoagulants: where do we stand? Ther Drug Monit. 2019;41(2):180–191. https://doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000000594

28. Pruis MA, Veerman GDM, Hassing HC, Lanser DAC, Paats MS, van Schaik RHN, et al. Cardiac toxicity of alectinib in patients with ALK + lung cancer: outcomes of cardio-oncology follow-up. JACC CardioOncol. 2023;5(1):102–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccao.2022.09.006

29. Hamdidouche I, Jullien V, Boutouyrie P, et al. Routine urinary detection of antihypertensive drugs for systematic evaluation of adherence to treatment in hypertensive patients. J Hypertens. 2017;35(9):1891–1918. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000001402

30. Selеznev SV, Mylnikov PYu, Shchulkin AV, Yakushin SS. Evaluation of treatment adherence in patients with arterial hypertension based on therapeutic drug monitoring data. Therapy. 2024;10(9):32–38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18565/therapy.2024.9.32-38

31. Ionov MV, Emelyanov IV, Konradi AO. Direct methods for assessing adherence to antihypertensive therapy: witnessed intake and therapeutic drug monitoring. Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2025;21(3):234–243. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20996/1819-6446-2025-3192

32. Raheja P, Arbique D, Das SR, Halm EA, Kaplan NM, Vongpatanasin W. Therapeutic drug monitoring facilitates blood pressure control in resistant hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(8):834–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.10.067

33. Rognstad S, Søraas CL, Brunborg C, Halvorsen LV, Brobak KM, Olsen E, et al. Pharmacokinetic variability of amlodipine serum concentration and effect on blood pressure in patients treated for hypertension. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2025;13(4): e70140. https://doi.org/10.1002/prp2.70140


Review

For citations:


Seleznev S.V., Shchulkin A.V., Mylnikov P.Yu., Yakushin S.S. Antihypertensive drugs pharmacokinetics evaluation for predicting blood pressure control in comorbid hypertensive patients. "Arterial’naya Gipertenziya" ("Arterial Hypertension"). 2026;32(1):107-116. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18705/1607-419X-2026-2526. EDN: XWMHFS

Views: 324

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1607-419X (Print)
ISSN 2411-8524 (Online)