Preview

"Arterial’naya Gipertenziya" ("Arterial Hypertension")

Advanced search

An association between echocardiographic left ventricle longitudinal strain and hypertension in general population depending on blood pressure control

https://doi.org/10.18705/1607-419X-2019-25-6-653-664

Abstract

Background. Ultrasound assessment of myocardial strain allows non-invasive identification of early stages of heart failure with preserved ventricular ejection fraction. A decline of the left ventricle (LV) global longitudinal strain in hypertension (HT) accompanied by LV hypertrophy (LVH) was reported in clinical samples with manifest HT. Data on the relationship between longitudinal strain and blood pressure (BP) and HT in general population is lacking. Objective. We studied the relationship between LV peak systolic global longitudinal strain (GLS) and strain rate (GSR) in subjects with high and controlled BP from a general population sample aged over 55 years. Design and methods. The cross-sectional study was based on a population cohort (HAPIEE, Novosibirsk). In a random sample (n = 416, aged 55–84 years old) we performed echocardiography and evaluated GLS and GSR of LV by speckle tracking technique. ANOVA multivariable models were applied. Results. In the studied sample, the prevalence of HT comprised 78,9 %. The mean GLS value was –18,7 ± 3,79 %, and it was lower in men than in women (–18,2 ± 3,85 % vs –19,2 ± 3,66 %, p = 0,005). The mean GSR value was –0,84 ± 0,17s–1 , and did not differ by sex. The absolute value of GLS in HT was lower than in normotensives: –18,5 ± 3,73 % vs –19,9 ± 3,42 %, p = 0,003; this difference was independent of age, sex and LV myocardial mass index (IMM), p = 0,011; but it was attenuated in a multivariable-adjusted model including body mass index (BMI). In HT groups, the GLS was the lowest among those “treated ineffectively” and significantly lower than in normotensives independently of age, sex and myocardium mass index (p = 0,008). The absolute value of GSR in HT was lower than in normotensives: –0,90 ± 0,17 s–1 vs –0,83 ± 0,17s–1 , p < 0,001; and persisted in multivariable models. GSR was the lowest among those “treated ineffectively” and significantly lower than in normotensives in multivariable models independently of age, sex, BMI and myocardial mass index (p = 0,017; 0,002). The average values of LV ejection fraction (Simpson) in all groups were above 50 % without significant inter-group differences (p = 0,904). conclusions. In the studied population sample, GLS and GSR of LV were associated with HT; however, the association between GLS and HT was largely explained by BMI. In hypertensives, the lowest GLS and GSR, as well as higher extent of LVH, were found among those treated ineffectively, which might point at the initial reduction of systolic ventricular function in HT with inadequate BP control.

About the Authors

A. N. Ryabikov
Research Institute of Internal and Preventive Medicine Branch of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences; Novosibirsk State Medical University
Russian Federation

Andrey N. Ryabikov, MD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Leading Researcher, Laboratory of Etiopathogenesis and Clinics of Internal Diseases, IIPM — branch of ICG SB RAS; Professor, Chair of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Transfusiology, Novosibirsk State Medical University

Novosibirsk



V. P. Guseva
Research Institute of Internal and Preventive Medicine Branch of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Varvara P. Guseva, MD, Post-Graduate Student, Laboratory of Etiopathogenesis and Clinics of Internal Diseases

175/1 B. Bogatkova street, Novosibirsk, 630089



E. V. Voronina
Research Institute of Internal and Preventive Medicine Branch of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Ekaterina V. Voronina, MD, Junior Researcher, Laboratory of Etiopathogenesis and Clinics of Internal Diseases

Novosibirsk



Yu. Yu. Palekhina
Research Institute of Internal and Preventive Medicine Branch of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Yulia Yu. Palekhina, MD, Specialist of Ultrasound Diagnostics, Laboratory of Etiopathogenesis and Clinics of Internal Diseases

Novosibirsk



S. G. Shakhmatov
Research Institute of Internal and Preventive Medicine Branch of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences; Novosibirsk State Medical University
Russian Federation
Sergey G. Shakhmatov, MD, PhD, Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Etiopathogenesis and Clinics of Internal Diseases, IIPM — branch of ICG SB RAS; Teaching Assistant, Chair of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Transfusiology, Novosibirsk State Medical University


Eu. G. Verevkin
Research Institute of Internal and Preventive Medicine Branch of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Evgeny G. Verevkin, PhD in Biological Science, Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Etiopathogenesis and Clinics of Internal Diseases

Novosibirsk



M. V. Holmes
University of Oxford
United Kingdom

Michael Holmes, MD, PhD, Research Fellow, Medical Research Council Population Health Research Unit

Oxford



M. Bobak
University College London
United Kingdom

Bobak Martin, MD, PhD, Professor of Epidemiology, Deputy Head, Department of Epidemiology & Public Health

London



S. K. Malyutina
Research Institute of Internal and Preventive Medicine Branch of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences; Novosibirsk State Medical University
Russian Federation

Sofya K. Malyutina, MD, PhD, Professor, Head, Laboratory of Etiopathogenesis and Clinics of Internal Diseases, IIPM — branch of ICG SB RAS; Professor, Chair of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Transfusiology, Novosibirsk State Medical University

Novosibirsk



References

1. A global brief on hypertension. Silent killer, global public health crisis WHO/DCO/WHD/2013.2. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.who.int/cardiovascular_diseases/publications/global_brief_hypertension/en/

2. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, Redon J, Zanchetti A, Böhm M et al. ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2013;34 (28):2159–2219. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht151

3. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Hypertension (ESH). Eur Heart J. 2018;39 (33):3021–3104. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001940

4. Sheridan E. Left ventricular hypertrophy. Ed. Sheridan DJ. London: Churchill Communications Europe Ltd.; 1998. 203 p.

5. Ryabikov A, Malyutina S, Shakhmatov S, Simonova G, Gafarov V. The prognostic differential of geometric patterns of left ventricular hypertrophy. J Hypertension. 2010;28: e402. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000379451.14187.26

6. Malyutina SK, Ryabikov AN, Simonova GI, Shakhmatov SG, Gafarov VV, Verevkin EG et al. Arterial hypertension and target-organ damage: Prognostic value of left ventricular hypertrophy in a Siberian population. Bulletin of RAMN. 2011;31(5):53–58. In Russian

7. Mareev VYu, Ageev FT, Arutyunov GP, Koroteev AV, Mareev YuV, Ovchinnikov AG et al. Diagnostics and treatment of CHF: SSHF, RCS and RSMST national guidelines (4th edition). Heart Failure J. 2013;14(7):379–472. In Russian.

8. Mareev VYu, Danielyan MO, Belenkov YuN. On behalf of the working group for EPOKhA-O-KhSN Study. Comparative characteristics of patients with CHF depending on ejection fraction by results of Russian multicenter study EPOKhA-O-KhSN. Heart Failure J. 2006;7(4):164–171. In Russian.

9. Alekhin MN. Ultrasonic methods of assessment of myocardial deformation and their clinical significance. Moscow: Vidar-M, 2012. 88 p. In Russian.

10. Teske A, De Boeck B, Melman P, Sieswerda G, Doevendans P, Cramer M. Echocardiographic quantification of myocardial function using tissue deformation imaging, a guide to image acquisition and analysis using tissue Doppler and speckle tracking. Cardiovascular Ultrasound. 2007;5(1):27. doi: 10.1186/1476-7120-5-27

11. Marwick T, Leano R., Brown J, Sun J, Hoffmann R, Lysyansky P et al. Myocardial strain measurement with 2-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography: definition of normal range. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2009;2(1):80–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2007.12.007

12. Geyer H, Caracciolo G, Abe H, Wilansky S, Carerj S, Gentile F et al. Assessment of myocardial mechanics using speckle tracking echocardiography: fundamentals and clinical applications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23(4):351–369. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2010.02.015

13. Voigt J, Pedrizzetti G, Lysyansky P, Marwick T, Houle H, Baumann R et al. Definitions for a common standard for 2D speckle tracking echocardiography: consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imaging. Eur Heart J. Cardiovascular Imaging. 2015;16(1):1–11. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu184

14. Sitia S, Tomasoni L, Turiel M. Speckle tracking echocardiography: a new approach to myocardial function. World J Cardiology. 2010;2(1):1. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v2.i1.1

15. Negishi K, Lucas S, Negishi T, Hamilton J, Marwick TH. What is the primary source of discordance in strain measurement between vendors: imaging or analysis? Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013;39(4):714–720. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.11.021

16. Cheng S, Larson MG, McCabe EL, Osypiuk E, Lehman BT, Stanchev P et al. Reproducibility of speckle-tracking-based strain measures of left ventricular function in a community-based study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013;26(11):1258–1266. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2013.07.002

17. Farsalinos KE, Daraban AM, Ünlü S, Thomas JD, Badano LP, Voigt JU. Head-to-head comparison of global longitudinal strain measurements among nine different vendors: the EACVI/ASE InterVendor Comparison study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28 (10):1171–1181. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.06.011

18. Pavliukova EN, Karpov RS. Deformation, rotation, and axial torsion of the left ventricle in coronary heart disease patients with its severe dysfunction. Ter Arkh. 2012;84(9):11–16. In Russian.

19. Dzyak GV, Kolesnik MY. Myocardial deformation and rotation in hypertensive men with different degrees of left ventricular hypertrophy. Kardiologiia. 2014;54(6):9–14. In Russian.

20. Kouzu H, Yuda S, Muranaka A, Do i T, Yamamoto H, Shimoshige S et al. Left ventricular hypertrophy causes different changes in longitudinal, radial, and circumferential mechanics in patients with hypertension: a two-dimensional speckle tracking study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011;24(2):192–199. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2010.10.020

21. Bendiab NST, Meziane-Tani A, Ouabdesselam S, Methia N, Latreche S, Henaoui L et al. Factors associated with global longitudinal strain decline in hypertensive patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction. EJPС. 2017;24(14):1463–1472. doi: 10.1177/2047487317721644

22. Sakiewicz W, Kuznetsova T, Kloch-Badelek M, Dhooge J, Ryabikov A, Kunicka K et al. Tissue Doppler indexes of left ventricular systolic function in relation to the pulsatile and steady components of blood pressure in a general population. J Hypertens. 2012;30(2):403–410. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32834ea41b

23. Kuznetsova T, Nijs E, Cauwenberghs N, Knez J, Thijs L, Haddad F et al. Temporal changes in left ventricular longitudinal strain in general population: Clinical correlates and impact on cardiac remodeling. Echocardiography. 2019:36(3):458–468. doi: 10.1111/echo.14246

24. Russo C, Jin Z, Elkind MS, Rundek T, Homma S, Sacco RL et al. Prevalence and prognostic value of subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction by global longitudinal strain in a community-based cohort. Eur J Heart Fail. 2014;16(12):1301–1309. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.154

25. Biering-Sørensen T, Biering-Sørensen SR, Olsen FJ, Sengeløv M, Jørgensen PG, Mogelvang R et al. Global longitudinal strain by echocardiography predicts long-term risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in a low-risk general population: The Copenhagen City Heart Study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10 (3):e005521. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.005521

26. Peasey A, Bobak M, Kubinova R, Malyutina S, Pajak A, Tamosiunas A et al. Determinants of cardiovascular disease and other non-communicable diseases in Central and Eastern Europe: Rationale and design of the HAPIEE study. BMC Public Health. 2006;18(6):255–265. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-255

27. Chen J, Cao T, Duan Y, Yuan L, Wang Z. Velocity vector imaging in assessing myocardial systolic function of hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. Canadian J Cardiol. 2007;23(12):957–961. doi: 10.1016/S0828-282X(07)70857-7

28. Ikonomidis I, Tzortzis S, Triantafyllidi H. Association of impaired left ventricular twisting-untwisting with vascular dysfunction, neurohumoral activation and impaired exercise capacity in hypertensive heart disease. Eur J Heart Failure. 2015;17 (12):1240–1251. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.403

29. Saghir M, Areces M, Makan M. Strain rate imaging differentiates hypertensive cardiac hypertrophy from physiologic cardiac hypertrophy (athlete’s heart). J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20(2):151–157. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2006.08.006

30. Monaster S, Ahmad M, Braik A. Comparison between strain and strain rate in hypertensive patients with and without left ventricular hypertrophy: a speckle-tracking study. Menoufia Med J. 2014;27(2):322. doi: 10.4103/1110-2098.141691

31. Galderisi M, Esposito R, Schiano-Lomoriello V, Santoro A, Ippolito R, Schiattarella P et al. Correlates of global area strain in native hypertensive patients: A three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;13 (9):730–738. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jes026

32. Hensel K, Andreas Jenke A, Leischik R. Speckle-tracking and tissue-Doppler stress echocardiography in arterial hypertension: a sensitive tool for detection of subclinical LV impairment. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014:472562. doi: 10.1155/2014/472562

33. Kuznetsova T, Herbots L, Richart T, D’hooge J, Thijs L, Fagard R et al. Left ventricular strain and strain rate in a general population. Eur Heart J. 2008;29(16):2014–2023. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn280

34. Dalen H, Thorstensen A, Aase S, Ingul C, Torp H, Vatten L et al. Segmental and global longitudinal strain and strain rate based on echocardiography of 1266 healthy individuals: the HUNT study in Norway. Eur Heart J. Cardiovascular Imaging. 2010;11 (2):176–183. doi: 10.1093/ejechocard/jep194

35. Saeki M, Sato N, Kawasaki M, Tanaka R, Nagaya M, Watanabe T et al. Left ventricular layer function in hypertension assessed by myocardial strain rate using novel one-beat realtime three-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography with high volume rates. Hypertens Res. 2015;38(8):551–559. doi: 10.1038/hr.2015.47

36. Wang S, Hu H, Lu M, Sirajuddin A, Li J, An J et al. Myocardial extracellular volume fraction quantified by cardiovascular magnetic resonance is increased in hypertension and associated with left ventricular remodeling. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(11):4620–4630. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4841-9

37. Kang S, Lim H, Choi B, Choi S, Hwang G, Yoon M et al. Longitudinal strain and torsion assessed by two-dimensional speckle tracking correlate with the serum level of tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1, a marker of myocardial fibrosis, in patients with hypertension. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008;21(8):907–911. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2008.01.015


Review

For citations:


Ryabikov A.N., Guseva V.P., Voronina E.V., Palekhina Yu.Yu., Shakhmatov S.G., Verevkin E.G., Holmes M.V., Bobak M., Malyutina S.K. An association between echocardiographic left ventricle longitudinal strain and hypertension in general population depending on blood pressure control. "Arterial’naya Gipertenziya" ("Arterial Hypertension"). 2019;25(6):653-664. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18705/1607-419X-2019-25-6-653-664

Views: 2764


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1607-419X (Print)
ISSN 2411-8524 (Online)