Preview

"Arterial’naya Gipertenziya" ("Arterial Hypertension")

Advanced search

Clinical manifestations of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas depending on the disease form and tumor characteristics: an analysis of a large patient cohort

https://doi.org/10.18705/1607-419X-2026-2579

EDN: GCBRBX

Abstract

Objective. To characterize the frequency of various symptoms of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma (PPGL) considering the clinical form of the disease and main tumor characteristics. Dеsign and methods. The study included medical records of 254 patients examined and operated for PPGL with detailed information on disease symptoms, including data obtained through standardized questionnaires. Depending on the PPGL manifestations, all patients were divided into 4 groups according to the clinical manifestations. Results. In the cohort, the most common symptoms were hypertensive crises (55,1 %), a feeling of tachycardia (54,3 %), constant increase in blood pressure (40,6 %), headache (39,4 %), sweating (32,3 %), and general weakness (28,0 %). The following symptoms were more common (Fisher's exact test with the Friedman-Hamilton extension was used) in patients with paroxysmal and mixed forms of the disease in comparison with continuous and asymptomatic forms: sensation of tachycardia (64,1 % and 61,3 % versus 25,0 % and 9,4 % for the subgroups, respectively; p < 0,001), headache (51,3 % and 35,5 % versus 16,7 % and 15,6 %; p < 0,001), dizziness (17,1 % and 25,8 % versus 0,0 % and 6,3 %; p = 0,024), hand tremor (27,4 % and 15,1 % versus 0,0 % and 3,1 %; p = 0,002), fear and anxiety (23,9 % and 25,8 % versus 0,0 % and 6,3 %; p = 0,027), feeling of hot flashes / fever or chills (30,8 % and 20,4 % versus 0,0 % and 9,4 %; p = 0,010), sweating (38,5 % and 36,6 % versus 8,3 % and 6,3 %; p = 0,001). The patients with paroxysmal or mixed forms of the disease manifested with the highest number of complaints. The total number of complaints correlated with the maximum systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) values, but not with the usual BP values. The classic triad of PPGL symptoms (headache, sweating, tachycardia) was present in 11,8 % of patients. Conclusion. The article provides detailed data on the symptomatology of PPGL in general and for individual clinical forms of the disease. The obtained data indicate that the main driver of clinical symptoms in PPGL is the presence of paroxysms during the disease course. Comparing to previous years, PPGL manifestations became less pronounced over time, which is likely due to improvements in PPGL diagnosis and refined diagnostic algorithms for patients with adrenal incidentalomas.

About the Authors

D. V. Rebrova
Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg State University Hospital
Russian Federation

Dina V. Rebrova, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Endocrine Surgery

St Petersburg



S. N. Fogt
North-Western State Medical University named after I. I. Mechnikov
Russian Federation

Sergey N. Fogt, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Endocrinology named after Academician V. G. Baranov

St Petersburg



R. A. Chernikov
Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg State University Hospital
Russian Federation

Roman A. Chernikov, MD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Department of Endocrine Surgery

St Petersburg



I. V. Sleptsov
Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg State University Hospital
Russian Federation

Ilya V. Sleptsov, MD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Head, Department of Endocrine Surgery

St Petersburg



E. A. Fedorov
Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg State University Hospital
Russian Federation

Elisey A. Fedorov, MD, PhD, Surgeon, Department of Endocrine Surgery

St Petersburg



I. K. Chinchuk
Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg State University Hospital
Russian Federation

Igor K. Chinchuk — MD, PhD, Surgeon, Department of Endocrine Surgery

St Petersburg



Sh. Sh. Shikhmagomedov
Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg State University Hospital
Russian Federation

Shamil Sh. Shikhmagomedov, MD, PhD, Surgeon of the Department of Endocrine Surgery

St Petersburg



N. V. Vorokhobina
North-Western State Medical University named after I. I. Mechnikov
Russian Federation

Natalia V. Vorokhobina, MD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Head, Department of Endocrinology named after academician V. G. Baranov

St Petersburg



V. F. Rusakov
Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg State University Hospital
Russian Federation

Vladimir F. Rusakov, MD, PhD, Endocrinologist, Department of Endocrine Surgery

St Petersburg



L. M. Krasnov
Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg State University Hospital
Russian Federation

Leonid M. Krasnov, MD, PhD, DSc, Head, Department of Science and Education

St Petersburg



References

1. McNeil AR, Blok BH, Koelmeyer TD, Burke MP, Hilton JM. Phaeochromocytomas discovered during coronial autopsies in Sydney, Melbourne and Auckland. Aust N Z J Med. 2000;30(6):648– 652. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-5994.2000.tb04358.x

2. Goldstein RE, O’Neill JA, Holcomb GW, Morgan WM, Neblett WW, Oates JA, et al. Clinical experience over 48 years with pheochromocytoma. Ann Surg. 1999;229(6):755–766. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199906000-00001

3. Kizer JR, Koniaris LS, Edelman JD, St John Sutton MG. Pheochromocytoma crisis, cardiomyopathy, and hemodynamic collapse. Chest. 2000;118(4):1221–1223. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.118.4.1221

4. Dedov II, Kuznetsov NS, Bel'cevich DG, Kuratev LV. 40-year experience in diagnosis and treatment of chromaffin tissue tumors. Problems of Endocrinology. 2003;49(1):44–50. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/probl11442

5. Bel'cevich DG, Troshina EA, Yukina MYu. Pheochromocytoma. Problems of Endocrinology. 2010;56(1):63–71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/probl201056163-71

6. Spiro A, Usman A, Ajmal A, Hoang TD, Shakir MKM. Asymptomatic and biochemically silent pheochromocytoma with characteristic findings on imaging. Case Rep Endocrinol. 2020;2020:8847261. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8847261

7. Shah ASV, Stelzle D, Lee KK, Beck EJ, Alam S, Clifford S, et al. Global burden of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in people living with HIV: systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation. 2018;138(11):1100–1112. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.033369

8. Amar L, Pacak K, Steichen O, Akker SA, Aylwin SJB, Baudin E, et al. International consensus on initial screening and follow-up of asymptomatic SDHx mutation carriers. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2021;17(7):435–444. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574021-00492-3

9. Aygun N, Uludag M. Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: from epidemiology to clinical findings. Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2020;54(2):159–168. https://doi.org/10.14744/SEMB.2020.18794

10. Dubois LA, Gray DK. Dopamine-secreting pheochromocytomas: in search of a syndrome. World J Surg. 2005;29(7):909–913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-7860-7

11. Manger WM. An overview of pheochromocytoma: history, current concepts, vagaries, and diagnostic challenges. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1073:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1353.001

12. Lenders JWM, Eisenhofer G, Mannelli M, Pacak K. Phaeochromocytoma. Lancet. 2005;366(9486):665–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67139-5

13. Lenders JWM, Duh QY, Eisenhofer G, Gimenez-Roqueplo AP, Grebe SKG, Murad MH, et al. Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(6):1915–1942. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2014-1498

14. Soltani A, Pourian M, Davani BM. Does this patient have pheochromocytoma? a systematic review of clinical signs and symptoms. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2015;15:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40200-016-0226-x

15. Prejbisz A, Lenders JWM, Eisenhofer G, Januszewicz A. Cardiovascular manifestations of phaeochromocytoma. J Hypertens. 2011;29(11):2049–2060. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0b013e32834a4ce9

16. Nazari MA, Hasan R, Haigney M, Maghsoudi A, Lenders JWM, Carey RM, et al. Catecholamine-induced hypertensive crises: current insights and management. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2023;11(12):942–954. https://doi.org/10.1016/S22138587(23)00256-5

17. Brouwers FM, Eisenhofer G, Lenders JWM, Pacak K. Emergencies caused by pheochromocytoma, neuroblastoma, or ganglioneuroma. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2006;35(4):699– 724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecl.2006.09.014

18. Agoubi LL, Khot SP, Failor RA, Zern NK. Pheochromocytoma-induced subarachnoid and intracerebral hemorrhage. J Endocr Soc. 2022;7(1):bvac176. https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvac176

19. Geroula A, Deutschbein T, Langton K, Masjkur J, Pamporaki C, Peitzsch M, et al. Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: clinical feature-based disease probability in relation to catecholamine biochemistry and reason for disease suspicion. Eur J Endocrinol. 2019;181(4):409–420. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-19-0159

20. Gruber LM, Hartman RP, Thompson GB, McKenzie TJ, Lyden ML, Dy BM, et al. Pheochromocytoma characteristics and behavior differ depending on method of discovery. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;104(5):1386–1393. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2018-01707

21. Amar L, Servais A, Gimenez-Roqueplo AP, Zinzindohoue F, Chatellier G, Plouin PF. Year of diagnosis, features at presentation, and risk of recurrence in patients with pheochromocytoma or secreting paraganglioma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(4):2110–2116. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2004-1398

22. Muth A, Crona J, Gimm O, Elmgren A, Filipsson K, Stenmark Askmalm M, et al. Genetic testing and surveillance guidelines in hereditary pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. J Intern Med. 2019;285(2):187–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12869

23. Falhammar H, Kjellman M, Calissendorff J. Initial clinical presentation and spectrum of pheochromocytoma: a study of 94 cases from a single center. Endocr Connect. 2017;7(1):186–192. https://doi.org/10.1530/EC-17-0321

24. Bockeria LA, Abdulgasanov RA, Shogenov MA, Abdulgasanova MR. Modern methods of diagnosis and treatment of paragangliomas (pheochromocytomas). Russian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2019;61(6):475–484. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24022/0236-2791-2019-61-6-475-484

25. Garcia-Carbonero R, Matute Teresa F, Mercader-Cidoncha E, Mitjavila-Casanovas M, Robledo M, Tena I, et al. Multidisciplinary practice guidelines for the diagnosis, genetic counseling and treatment of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. Clin Transl Oncol. 2021;23(10):1995–2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-021-02622-9

26. Mannelli M, Ianni L, Cilotti A, Conti A. Pheochromocytoma in Italy: a multicentric retrospective study. Eur J Endocrinol. 1999;141(6):619–624. https://doi.org/10.1530/eje.0.1410619

27. Kopetschke R, Slisko M, Kilisli A, Tuschy U, Wallaschofski H, Fassnacht M, et al. Frequent incidental discovery of phaeochromocytoma: data from a German cohort of 201 phaeochromocytoma. Eur J Endocrinol. 2009;161(2):355–361. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-09-0384


Review

For citations:


Rebrova D.V., Fogt S.N., Chernikov R.A., Sleptsov I.V., Fedorov E.A., Chinchuk I.K., Shikhmagomedov Sh.Sh., Vorokhobina N.V., Rusakov V.F., Krasnov L.M. Clinical manifestations of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas depending on the disease form and tumor characteristics: an analysis of a large patient cohort. "Arterial’naya Gipertenziya" ("Arterial Hypertension"). 2026;32(2):182-193. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18705/1607-419X-2026-2579. EDN: GCBRBX

Views: 254

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1607-419X (Print)
ISSN 2411-8524 (Online)