Clinical manifestations of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas depending on the disease form and tumor characteristics: an analysis of a large patient cohort
https://doi.org/10.18705/1607-419X-2026-2579
EDN: GCBRBX
Abstract
Objective. To characterize the frequency of various symptoms of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma (PPGL) considering the clinical form of the disease and main tumor characteristics. Dеsign and methods. The study included medical records of 254 patients examined and operated for PPGL with detailed information on disease symptoms, including data obtained through standardized questionnaires. Depending on the PPGL manifestations, all patients were divided into 4 groups according to the clinical manifestations. Results. In the cohort, the most common symptoms were hypertensive crises (55,1 %), a feeling of tachycardia (54,3 %), constant increase in blood pressure (40,6 %), headache (39,4 %), sweating (32,3 %), and general weakness (28,0 %). The following symptoms were more common (Fisher's exact test with the Friedman-Hamilton extension was used) in patients with paroxysmal and mixed forms of the disease in comparison with continuous and asymptomatic forms: sensation of tachycardia (64,1 % and 61,3 % versus 25,0 % and 9,4 % for the subgroups, respectively; p < 0,001), headache (51,3 % and 35,5 % versus 16,7 % and 15,6 %; p < 0,001), dizziness (17,1 % and 25,8 % versus 0,0 % and 6,3 %; p = 0,024), hand tremor (27,4 % and 15,1 % versus 0,0 % and 3,1 %; p = 0,002), fear and anxiety (23,9 % and 25,8 % versus 0,0 % and 6,3 %; p = 0,027), feeling of hot flashes / fever or chills (30,8 % and 20,4 % versus 0,0 % and 9,4 %; p = 0,010), sweating (38,5 % and 36,6 % versus 8,3 % and 6,3 %; p = 0,001). The patients with paroxysmal or mixed forms of the disease manifested with the highest number of complaints. The total number of complaints correlated with the maximum systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) values, but not with the usual BP values. The classic triad of PPGL symptoms (headache, sweating, tachycardia) was present in 11,8 % of patients. Conclusion. The article provides detailed data on the symptomatology of PPGL in general and for individual clinical forms of the disease. The obtained data indicate that the main driver of clinical symptoms in PPGL is the presence of paroxysms during the disease course. Comparing to previous years, PPGL manifestations became less pronounced over time, which is likely due to improvements in PPGL diagnosis and refined diagnostic algorithms for patients with adrenal incidentalomas.
About the Authors
D. V. RebrovaRussian Federation
Dina V. Rebrova, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Endocrine Surgery
St Petersburg
S. N. Fogt
Russian Federation
Sergey N. Fogt, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Endocrinology named after Academician V. G. Baranov
St Petersburg
R. A. Chernikov
Russian Federation
Roman A. Chernikov, MD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Department of Endocrine Surgery
St Petersburg
I. V. Sleptsov
Russian Federation
Ilya V. Sleptsov, MD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Head, Department of Endocrine Surgery
St Petersburg
E. A. Fedorov
Russian Federation
Elisey A. Fedorov, MD, PhD, Surgeon, Department of Endocrine Surgery
St Petersburg
I. K. Chinchuk
Russian Federation
Igor K. Chinchuk — MD, PhD, Surgeon, Department of Endocrine Surgery
St Petersburg
Sh. Sh. Shikhmagomedov
Russian Federation
Shamil Sh. Shikhmagomedov, MD, PhD, Surgeon of the Department of Endocrine Surgery
St Petersburg
N. V. Vorokhobina
Russian Federation
Natalia V. Vorokhobina, MD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Head, Department of Endocrinology named after academician V. G. Baranov
St Petersburg
V. F. Rusakov
Russian Federation
Vladimir F. Rusakov, MD, PhD, Endocrinologist, Department of Endocrine Surgery
St Petersburg
L. M. Krasnov
Russian Federation
Leonid M. Krasnov, MD, PhD, DSc, Head, Department of Science and Education
St Petersburg
References
1. McNeil AR, Blok BH, Koelmeyer TD, Burke MP, Hilton JM. Phaeochromocytomas discovered during coronial autopsies in Sydney, Melbourne and Auckland. Aust N Z J Med. 2000;30(6):648– 652. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-5994.2000.tb04358.x
2. Goldstein RE, O’Neill JA, Holcomb GW, Morgan WM, Neblett WW, Oates JA, et al. Clinical experience over 48 years with pheochromocytoma. Ann Surg. 1999;229(6):755–766. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199906000-00001
3. Kizer JR, Koniaris LS, Edelman JD, St John Sutton MG. Pheochromocytoma crisis, cardiomyopathy, and hemodynamic collapse. Chest. 2000;118(4):1221–1223. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.118.4.1221
4. Dedov II, Kuznetsov NS, Bel'cevich DG, Kuratev LV. 40-year experience in diagnosis and treatment of chromaffin tissue tumors. Problems of Endocrinology. 2003;49(1):44–50. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/probl11442
5. Bel'cevich DG, Troshina EA, Yukina MYu. Pheochromocytoma. Problems of Endocrinology. 2010;56(1):63–71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/probl201056163-71
6. Spiro A, Usman A, Ajmal A, Hoang TD, Shakir MKM. Asymptomatic and biochemically silent pheochromocytoma with characteristic findings on imaging. Case Rep Endocrinol. 2020;2020:8847261. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8847261
7. Shah ASV, Stelzle D, Lee KK, Beck EJ, Alam S, Clifford S, et al. Global burden of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in people living with HIV: systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation. 2018;138(11):1100–1112. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.033369
8. Amar L, Pacak K, Steichen O, Akker SA, Aylwin SJB, Baudin E, et al. International consensus on initial screening and follow-up of asymptomatic SDHx mutation carriers. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2021;17(7):435–444. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574021-00492-3
9. Aygun N, Uludag M. Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: from epidemiology to clinical findings. Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2020;54(2):159–168. https://doi.org/10.14744/SEMB.2020.18794
10. Dubois LA, Gray DK. Dopamine-secreting pheochromocytomas: in search of a syndrome. World J Surg. 2005;29(7):909–913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-7860-7
11. Manger WM. An overview of pheochromocytoma: history, current concepts, vagaries, and diagnostic challenges. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1073:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1353.001
12. Lenders JWM, Eisenhofer G, Mannelli M, Pacak K. Phaeochromocytoma. Lancet. 2005;366(9486):665–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67139-5
13. Lenders JWM, Duh QY, Eisenhofer G, Gimenez-Roqueplo AP, Grebe SKG, Murad MH, et al. Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(6):1915–1942. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2014-1498
14. Soltani A, Pourian M, Davani BM. Does this patient have pheochromocytoma? a systematic review of clinical signs and symptoms. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2015;15:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40200-016-0226-x
15. Prejbisz A, Lenders JWM, Eisenhofer G, Januszewicz A. Cardiovascular manifestations of phaeochromocytoma. J Hypertens. 2011;29(11):2049–2060. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0b013e32834a4ce9
16. Nazari MA, Hasan R, Haigney M, Maghsoudi A, Lenders JWM, Carey RM, et al. Catecholamine-induced hypertensive crises: current insights and management. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2023;11(12):942–954. https://doi.org/10.1016/S22138587(23)00256-5
17. Brouwers FM, Eisenhofer G, Lenders JWM, Pacak K. Emergencies caused by pheochromocytoma, neuroblastoma, or ganglioneuroma. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2006;35(4):699– 724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecl.2006.09.014
18. Agoubi LL, Khot SP, Failor RA, Zern NK. Pheochromocytoma-induced subarachnoid and intracerebral hemorrhage. J Endocr Soc. 2022;7(1):bvac176. https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvac176
19. Geroula A, Deutschbein T, Langton K, Masjkur J, Pamporaki C, Peitzsch M, et al. Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: clinical feature-based disease probability in relation to catecholamine biochemistry and reason for disease suspicion. Eur J Endocrinol. 2019;181(4):409–420. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-19-0159
20. Gruber LM, Hartman RP, Thompson GB, McKenzie TJ, Lyden ML, Dy BM, et al. Pheochromocytoma characteristics and behavior differ depending on method of discovery. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;104(5):1386–1393. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2018-01707
21. Amar L, Servais A, Gimenez-Roqueplo AP, Zinzindohoue F, Chatellier G, Plouin PF. Year of diagnosis, features at presentation, and risk of recurrence in patients with pheochromocytoma or secreting paraganglioma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(4):2110–2116. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2004-1398
22. Muth A, Crona J, Gimm O, Elmgren A, Filipsson K, Stenmark Askmalm M, et al. Genetic testing and surveillance guidelines in hereditary pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. J Intern Med. 2019;285(2):187–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12869
23. Falhammar H, Kjellman M, Calissendorff J. Initial clinical presentation and spectrum of pheochromocytoma: a study of 94 cases from a single center. Endocr Connect. 2017;7(1):186–192. https://doi.org/10.1530/EC-17-0321
24. Bockeria LA, Abdulgasanov RA, Shogenov MA, Abdulgasanova MR. Modern methods of diagnosis and treatment of paragangliomas (pheochromocytomas). Russian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2019;61(6):475–484. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24022/0236-2791-2019-61-6-475-484
25. Garcia-Carbonero R, Matute Teresa F, Mercader-Cidoncha E, Mitjavila-Casanovas M, Robledo M, Tena I, et al. Multidisciplinary practice guidelines for the diagnosis, genetic counseling and treatment of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. Clin Transl Oncol. 2021;23(10):1995–2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-021-02622-9
26. Mannelli M, Ianni L, Cilotti A, Conti A. Pheochromocytoma in Italy: a multicentric retrospective study. Eur J Endocrinol. 1999;141(6):619–624. https://doi.org/10.1530/eje.0.1410619
27. Kopetschke R, Slisko M, Kilisli A, Tuschy U, Wallaschofski H, Fassnacht M, et al. Frequent incidental discovery of phaeochromocytoma: data from a German cohort of 201 phaeochromocytoma. Eur J Endocrinol. 2009;161(2):355–361. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-09-0384
Review
For citations:
Rebrova D.V., Fogt S.N., Chernikov R.A., Sleptsov I.V., Fedorov E.A., Chinchuk I.K., Shikhmagomedov Sh.Sh., Vorokhobina N.V., Rusakov V.F., Krasnov L.M. Clinical manifestations of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas depending on the disease form and tumor characteristics: an analysis of a large patient cohort. "Arterial’naya Gipertenziya" ("Arterial Hypertension"). 2026;32(2):182-193. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18705/1607-419X-2026-2579. EDN: GCBRBX
JATS XML



























